Yep, however if i understand the specs correctly the MP is only relevant to the still camera capabilities not the video. Video is measured in fps. I don't think the processor is set up to capture data for 11 MP per frame in video mode. The file would be huge. I have a Canon 7D (16 MP) and shooting in small RAW each photo on average is about 20 MB. Large RAW is over 30 MB per photo. That's a big file and eats storage quickly. Even in JPEG they are large files. The processor in the gopro could not collect, process and store that much data in a video capturing data at 30 fps.
As for larger MP in a still camera, unless you are shooting in RAW or intend to blow up the pic 11 mp is, arguably, overkill for the gopro. To put it in perspective, Canon 1D X a $7,000 camera body is 18 MP. And it was only recently that Canon stepped up the MP from about 10 MP for the 1D range. If MP was important Canon would grace their top of line camera with more MP a long time ago. It goes to show that the processor is more important than outright MP. Also more MP you have on a processor (of equal size) the more noise and interference you get between pixels. Arguably the 11 MP will give you more detail in the photo but also, subject to the processor, give an increased amount of noise. The MP givith, the processor taketh.
Photography, on the most part, is consumer driven not needs driven. Consumers want large MP, fast fps but in reality can't realise the potential because of storage limitations in the camera, post production processing capabilities etc.
The other limitation to take into account is the internet. Vimeo converts your video to 26 or 30 fps (I think) and other video and photo web sites will curtail your video/image file in size and quality to meet the portal and download capabilities of the website. Again the Ferrari analogy.
cheers MLD




Reply With Quote



Bookmarks