Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 40

Thread: bent trailing arms

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,251
    Total Downloaded
    0
    bung some early Rangie ones in - they are a lot stronger...it's the cheapest option to address this 'factory' problem

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    1,209
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by INter674 View Post
    bung some early Rangie ones in - they are a lot stronger...it's the cheapest option to address this 'factory' problem
    Are the RRC ones the same as a D1, as in, is it a straight swap?

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    NSW , Pennant Hills
    Posts
    3,477
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by nice1guv View Post
    Are the RRC ones the same as a D1, as in, is it a straight swap?
    Yes.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    1,209
    Total Downloaded
    0
    ...and the RRC ones are definitely stronger than the D1 ones?

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Down the road from Sydney
    Posts
    14,702
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by dullbird View Post
    funnily enough it was you......I'm guessing you dont recall me asking you this about 3 months ago.

    I told you both my arms have a slight bend in them, but they were both bent/curved in the same place. your exact words were its supposed to be like that.

    I had ian looking at them under the car when I contact you as he wasn't sure whether or not they should be like that....it was when we were changing the bushes that I had noticed it once both trailing arms went back on.
    I just want to apologise to Phil.......Once posting this I walked out to the car and realised it was in fact NOT the Trailing arms I talked to phil about and in fact it was the outriggers ABOVE the traling arms I asked him about the curve/ bend that was there on both sides. to which he said was normal...not bends in the traling arms like I had thought.

    I had totally got my self all confused...... so please disregard my comments above.

    So in lue of this I'm extremely happy I don't have to get new trailing arms.

    Christ I can be a numpty sometimes.
    Last edited by dullbird; 14th August 2009 at 05:20 PM. Reason: changed from radius to trailing
    Our Land Rover does not leak oil! it just marks its territory.......




  6. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    1,209
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by dullbird View Post
    I just want to apologise to Phil.......Once posting this I walked out to the car and realised it was in fact NOT the Trailing arms I talked to phil about and in fact it was the outriggers ABOVE the trailing arms I asked him about the curve/ bend that was there on both sides. to which he said was normal...not bends in the traling arms like I had thought.

    I had totally got my self all confused...... so please disregard my comments above.

    So in lue of this I'm extremely happy I don't have to get new trailing arms.

    Christ I can be a numpty sometimes.
    Well, I'd better stop laughing then.

    Radius arms / trailing arms - aren't we talking about the rear trailing arms here?
    Last edited by dullbird; 14th August 2009 at 05:21 PM. Reason: changed from radius to trailing thanks to Mr quotey quotey:D

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Down the road from Sydney
    Posts
    14,702
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by nice1guv View Post
    Well, I'd better stop laughing then.

    Radius arms / trailing arms - aren't we talking about the rear trailing arms here?

    for christ sake I meant trailing arms stop quoting me and picking up all my mistakes now I have to go through and edit it all
    Our Land Rover does not leak oil! it just marks its territory.......




  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Padstow NSW
    Posts
    4,501
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by INter674 View Post
    bung some early Rangie ones in - they are a lot stronger...it's the cheapest option to address this 'factory' problem
    not from what ive seen.
    i have a pair of rangie ones (off a 10 spline diff, dont know their age) the diameter of the tube is smaller as is the diameter of the pin end. these would deffinatly not be stronger than the disco ones.

    cheers phil

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Douglas Park, NSW
    Posts
    9,347
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I know for a fact that '87 RR arms aren't very strong .

    Let's hope that '88 ones are stronger .
    Scott

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Padstow NSW
    Posts
    4,501
    Total Downloaded
    0
    ive confered with the shed and some drawings i did for my cranked arms.

    its like this.

    early RRC have a bigger dia tube, thin wall section, small chassis end pin and a cast diff end bush boss.
    later arms have smaller dia tube (6mm smaller than the rrc) thicker wall (by 2mm) have a larger chassis end pin and a solid diff end bush boss.

    cheers phil

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!