
Originally Posted by
twr7cx
THIS IS MY EXACT POINT TO YOU IN THE POST ABOVE! What I would suggest to you is that you should insert the term 'snatch' in-between 'NO' and 'recovery'.
Yes, you are right, I meant no snatch recovery, but omitted snatch.My mistake. The point I was trying to make, not in a very good way, I admit, after seeing the photo of the damaged squash can, was that that could happen both from frontal impact,or an over vigorous snatch.[ in the other direction, of course] When I purchased my bull bar from ARB the salesman told me the bull bar tow points could be used for snatch recovery. I disagreed. When I asked for a written guarantee, that a snatch recovery would not damage the crush cans,he refused . We are probably on the same wavelength, but I jumped in feet first . The reference to a Roo was , if you just tapped the fence, that means we have to change the crush cans after every similar incident. How many people even check their crush cans after a tap? Bob
I’m pretty sure the dinosaurs died out when they stopped gathering food and started having meetings to discuss gathering food
A bookshop is one of the only pieces of evidence we have that people are still thinking
Bookmarks