Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 34

Thread: Discovery 2 Dual Battery

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    The Hills.
    Posts
    19,161
    Total Downloaded
    152.79 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by Bohica View Post
    True, I mean with 321 cars a day in the USA catching fire, we want to reduce the number that burn. Oh that is the number for petrol and diesel vehicles.
    Data from Sweden had ICE vehicles have a 1 in 38,000 chance of catching fire, those numbers include hybrid cars. Ice vehicles have a 1 in 1300 chance of catching fire. Access Denied
    You can make statistics say anything you want. ICE cars of course have fuel that burns. That's what combustion means, after all. EVs are not supposed to burn, but they do, and you can't put the bloody fires out.

    MotorTrend has skin in the game. You may want to broaden your reading.
    ​JayTee

    Nullus Anxietus

    Cancer is gender blind.

    2000 D2 TD5 Auto: Tins
    1994 D1 300TDi Manual: Dave
    1980 SIII Petrol Tray: Doris
    OKApotamus #74
    Nanocom, D2 TD5 only.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Williamstown, Victoria
    Posts
    3,244
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Tins View Post
    You can make statistics say anything you want. ICE cars of course have fuel that burns. That's what combustion means, after all. EVs are not supposed to burn, but they do, and you can't put the bloody fires out.

    MotorTrend has skin in the game. You may want to broaden your reading.
    I'd suggest that ICE vehicles are not meant to burn either.

    Data is data. No matter what the source.
    There was a Tesla Semi fire a few weeks ago. made the news. First one. How many diesel semis catch fire each day in the US?
    D2a Td5 Manual, Chawton White. aka "Daisy"
    Build date 11th Oct 2003
    Freelander 2 2011, manual, the daughter calls it Perri
    Before I had a Land Rover I did not have any torque wrenches. Now I have three.
    LROCV #1410

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    The Hills.
    Posts
    19,161
    Total Downloaded
    152.79 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by Bohica View Post
    I'd suggest that ICE vehicles are not meant to burn either.

    Data is data. No matter what the source.
    There was a Tesla Semi fire a few weeks ago. made the news. First one. How many diesel semis catch fire each day in the US?
    Data can be manipulated, Julian. That's obvious, happens every day. That's the purpose of the MSM, of which MotorTrend is a part. What is the ratio between diesel and electric prime movers? What caused the fire? Do diesel PMs catch fire when simply parked? Do they catch fire if the operator is stupid enough to refuel them? When they burn, can the fire service extinguish them? Does the fire service then have to monitor them, and follow them to their grave, do they need to be isolated from everything else for months afterwards? No. Do they have to have special sections set aside for parking, or on ferries? No. Can you say the same about EVs? No.

    Have a look at who owns MotorTrend. Check out just where their income is sourced. Nothing to see here?
    ​JayTee

    Nullus Anxietus

    Cancer is gender blind.

    2000 D2 TD5 Auto: Tins
    1994 D1 300TDi Manual: Dave
    1980 SIII Petrol Tray: Doris
    OKApotamus #74
    Nanocom, D2 TD5 only.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jul 2024
    Location
    Mid North Coast, NSW
    Posts
    100
    Total Downloaded
    5.57 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by drivesafe View Post
    Hi mate and this is a touchy subject for anyone who thinks DC/DC devices are the end all.

    First off, and I will use a D4 as the example, DC/DC devices are only about 80% efficient and thats as long as the auxiliary battery is not too low and the alternator voltage is high enough.

    Whereas, my Traxide isolators are at least 99% efficient regardless of alternator voltage.

    The current charge limit of a DC/DC device means it can take as much as 6x as long to replace the same amount of used energy that a Traxide system will replace in a much shorter time.

    And this something moist people are unaware of, modern DC/DC devices are, for safety reasons, INPUT current limited. This means as the voltage from the alternator drops, a DC/DC device needs to draw more current from the alternator to maintain the OUTPUT charging current.

    But again, as stated, for safety reasons, this INPUT current is now limited and as the alternator voltage drops, the OUTPUT charge current reduces, regardless of whether the auxiliary battery is in a low state of charge or not

    So while the DC/DC device may be rated as a 40 amp charger, it is not uncommon for them to be charging at less that 20 amps when used in a vehicle with a SMART alternator, like D4s.


    Lot more to it but this is a start.
    Yeah that makes sense, thanks mate. I guess I have learnt all my dual battery knowledge from mainstream sources so they're always going to spruke large brands and dc-dc products etc. - I've probably never had an issue with my dc-dc / aux battery charging since I mostly have had solar input backing it up

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Queensland
    Posts
    7,904
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by reid25 View Post
    Yeah that makes sense, thanks mate. I guess I have learnt all my dual battery knowledge from mainstream sources so they're always going to spruke large brands and dc-dc products etc. - I've probably never had an issue with my dc-dc / aux battery charging since I mostly have had solar input backing it up
    Con't get me wrong, I have never claimed DC/DC setups can't charge batteries, they are just not the only or best way to do it.

    Most people get what they pay for when installing a DC/DC setup, but they can usually get a better setup for less money.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    The Hills.
    Posts
    19,161
    Total Downloaded
    152.79 MB
    Thought this might be of interest. I don't know one way or the other, but I would like to hear Tim's opinion.

    <br>
    ​JayTee

    Nullus Anxietus

    Cancer is gender blind.

    2000 D2 TD5 Auto: Tins
    1994 D1 300TDi Manual: Dave
    1980 SIII Petrol Tray: Doris
    OKApotamus #74
    Nanocom, D2 TD5 only.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Queensland
    Posts
    7,904
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Hi Jay Tee, and I will use how my isolators work to demonstrate how you can get around the charging problem he has.

    First and foremost, from the data he supplied in his video, my guess is that his auxiliary battery is badly sulphated.

    My reason for this is that the battery went down to as low as 11.80v in a short period of time, when under load. The current load of two fridges would not have been that large. This indicates that the battery was down to around 30 to 40% State of Charge of its “AVAILABLE” capacity.

    Then when he went for a drive, the 25 amp DC/DC charger only charged in the Bulk/Absorption cycle for about an hour and then went into Float mode.

    This means that it only supplied about 20 amperes of capacity, at best, in that short time before the DC/DC deice determined that the battery was near fully charged.

    The auxiliary battery looks like an 80Ah to 100Ah capacity.

    I’ll use the 80Ah capacity to demonstrate the problem.

    Again based on the data supplied, the battery is so severely sulphated that it has about only 20 to 30% of its original capacity available for use.

    He needs to Desulphate the battery before he does anything else, otherwise, it early demise is imminent.

    The other solenoid type isolator will not solve his problem but it allow the auxiliary battery to get a bit more of a charge.

    This is on a Toyota, which does NOT have a SMART alternator, but if this was in a vehicle with a SMART alternator, the problem would be worse and the solenoid type isolator would not help.

    With my Traxide isolators, while you will still get Sulphation happening if you don’t maintain your batteries properly, it does take much linger to occur.

    There are a number of reasons for this, but basically you get better performance with a Traxide isolator because it shares the load of two batteries, which means the two batteries will never be as low as a single battery setup, and this means you will recharge the two batteries in a shorter drive time, and because the two batteries are always in a higher state of charge, Shulphation takes much longer to buildup..

    Unlike DC/DC devices ad their limited charge current, the Traxide isolators all everything an alternator can turn out too again, recharge the two batteries in a shorter time.

    Also note, the guy is using a Deep Cycle battery as the auxiliary battery, but I ALWAYS recommend you use a CRANKING type battery as the auxiliary battery because they are specifically designed to take high currents ( fast charge ) while charging. Because of the design, Deep Cycle batteries actually take much longer to fully charge.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    14,127
    Total Downloaded
    99.87 MB
    Ahhh, thats the advantage of a Traxide unit over a traditional voltage sensitive relay that isolates when the alternator stops charging.
    Cheers
    Slunnie


    ~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~

  9. #29
    TonyC is offline Wizard Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    NE Victoria
    Posts
    1,413
    Total Downloaded
    32.83 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by drivesafe View Post
    Also note, the guy is using a Deep Cycle battery as the auxiliary battery, but I ALWAYS recommend you use a CRANKING type battery as the auxiliary battery because they are specifically designed to take high currents ( fast charge ) while charging. Because of the design, Deep Cycle batteries actually take much longer to fully charge.
    Hi Tim,

    If you discharge a battery to a low state of charge regularly, what is the difference in life between a deep cycle and cranking battery?

    As always, thanks for your input to AULRO.

    Tony

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Queensland
    Posts
    7,904
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Deep Cycle vs Cranking batteries.

    Hi Tony and sorry for the delay in replying but I am flat-out.

    The principal difference between Deep Cycle batteries and cranking batteries “WAS” the number of deep cycles each battery could provide before needing to be replaced.

    I emphasised WAS because this really only applies to older type deep cycle batteries verses older type cranking batteries.

    With the older type batteries, while you could always deep cycle both types, dedicated Deep Cycle batteries could deliver far more cycles that a cranking battery.

    Prior to about 25 or so years ago, the RV industry used cranking batteries for all its needs, like Auxiliary batteries in vehicles and House batteries in caravans and Motorhomes, and while camper trailers were only just beginning to be produced in numbers, they too were supplied with cranking batteries.

    The original Deep Cycle batteries were glass and some came with as much as an 18 year warranty, but being glass were totally useless for RV use.

    These Glass batteries were designed to be used in Remote Area Power Supplies and Uninterruptible Power Supplies, where they were used in large banks of batteries, where large currents could be drawn from the bank, while only drawing very small currents from each battery in the bank.

    Again these banks were also charged with high currents but each battery would only be drawing a small charge current.

    The first Deep Cycle batteries we recognise today were still specifically intended for the original use. as such, they had a number of limitations that made them unsuitable for RV use, but people tried to use them anyway.

    Wet cell Deep Cycle batteries could be used as long as they were not placed in the engine bay.

    When the first AGM type Deep Cycle batteries started being used in RV situations, it was quickly realised that they had a very short lifespan. This is because, like the old Glass type Deep cycle batteries, they did not tolerate high temperatures, or high charging currents and especially had no tolerance for high voltages.

    As the manufacturers came to realise that there was a huge potential market for their batteries in the RV industry, battery techknowledgy improved, first with the maximum voltage rising from 14.1v to 14.4v then finally 14.7 to 15.0v.

    At the same time, maximum charging currents rose from 20% to 35 to 40% and higher with some Deep Cycle batteries.

    BUT, not sure heat tolerance has risen enough for safe under bonnet use. ( personal opinion )

    Then about 15 years ago, the first AGM cranking batteries came on the market and these offered high operational advantages over AGM type of Deep Cycle batteries.

    All AGM cranking batteries tolerate at least 14.7v and many are safe at 15v. They literally have no charge current limitation but best of all, they are completely safe to use under the bonnet.

    All cranking batteries have been safe to discharge down to 20% SoC and many of the newer ones, as stated by the manufacturers of these batteries, can be safely cycled down to 0%.

    Particularly with their rapid recharging capability, this makes AGM cranking batteries ideal to use as auxiliary batteries.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!