The biggest argument I've heard is that 'they' don't obey the road rules - well neither do a hell of a lot of drivers. From their side, 'theyy say they're allowed to ride on the road - well they are, but if you can't maintain the traffic flow or present a danger to yourself or other motorists, then I don't feel 'they' should be on the road.
I had a '43 Jeep and it didn't like anything past 50kph (okay maybe I didn't), anyway, it had full rego so I paid my way and was allowed to use the road. Say I wanted to go for a run up the freeway..at 50kph on a Friday arvo when everyone else is trying to get home or go on holidays - is it appropriate that i clog up a lane because 'it's my right!!!'.
There is an offence of unreasonable obstruction, and in that example it would be upheld.
I think it's great that people can commute by cycle and it's great they're keeping fit, but there's a time and place and unfortunately the roads and routes are not designed for cyclists - cycling is still considered by the RTA etc as a recreational pursuit, not a legitimate means of transport.
So all the us v. them stuff, in the most part it's not appropriate for them to be on the road in peak periods - and for the ones who say, 'well it's my life' - that's rubbish - it's the poor bugger who squashes them, the poor bugger who scrapes them off the road/out of wheel wells, the poor bugger who knocks on the door and tells the rello's and the remaining family. I reckon they're selfish to rely on the 'it's my right' argument.
My 2 bob.
Matt.



Reply With Quote
), and assist with two local council cycleway committees. What are you now going to do?


Bookmarks