Page 8 of 11 FirstFirst ... 678910 ... LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 101

Thread: D4 with LLAMS height adjustor and MTR (19's)

  1. #71
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Melbourne, Vic
    Posts
    547
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I'm tempted to go for the GOE rods if they are as easy to adjust as the claims state. I'm not keen on a permanent lift and I don't go off road often enough to really warrant a llams install. I do like the look of the llams though

  2. #72
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    2,622
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Ashes,
    Tha LLAMS kit is not a "Permanent" lift & can be dialled to 3 different offroad settings if/when required or just turned off & left at normal ride height.

    If you chose the rods, then you will have remove/refit all the time when you again want normal ride height.

    Go The LLAMS.

  3. #73
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne, mostly
    Posts
    2,442
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Yep Llams all the way. Second choice would be rods, specifically GoE as they are two way (I say this without having ever used them) and then single-position rods such as Johnson which I have and confirm are well made little units.

  4. #74
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    191
    Total Downloaded
    0

    LLams & Rods

    Does LR void any claims for suspension components, CVs, EAS or anything vaguely related when these after market items are installed and used.

    I presume physical evidence would exist when rods are fitted and removed (if only finger prints or tell tale very clean bits) and software mods must be evident if LR had to have a close look to ascertain acceptance of any warranty claim.

    Has anybody had experience with LR with this or am I being a little parnoid? Or is that D3 owners out of warranty making good use of these seemingly great devices?

  5. #75
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne, mostly
    Posts
    2,442
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Warranty and mods. Much depends on the manufacturer, the dealer, and whoever is handling the claim so generalisations cannot be made. Any modification at all runs some risk of warranty knockback.

    The result can vary from "well you modified the car therefore all bets are off for anything even remotely related" to "we'll honour the warranty but not that particular part". For example, if you had a conventional car and lifted it by 2" then the manufacturer wouldn't warrant the springs and dampers, and could (I've seen it) not warrant the CV joints on the basis they were now acting at angles they weren't designed for. Land Rover could make the same claim, but it would be more difficult in their case as a 2" lift puts the vehicle into Offroad Height and it is clearly designed to operate at that height offroad which will place significant stresses on the driveline.

    Ultimately my view is that I need the mods for what I do, and I run the warranty risk.

    If you think the situation is being handled unreasonably you can take the matter to court for a nominal fee. A friend has done that with Toyota and won quite convincingly over a warranty claim on a front diff, but he did have a good case.

  6. #76
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Melbourne, Vic
    Posts
    547
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by sniegy View Post
    Ashes,
    Tha LLAMS kit is not a "Permanent" lift & can be dialled to 3 different offroad settings if/when required or just turned off & left at normal ride height.

    If you chose the rods, then you will have remove/refit all the time when you again want normal ride height.

    Go The LLAMS.
    Pete, I'm familiar with the LLAMS having been there for the install on rmp's car. A very good piece of kit. The GOE rods look pretty handy in that they appear easy to swap heights without having to remove the rods. Just not sure yet how easy they are to convert from normal to offroad height. The GOE rods are also much easier to sneak onto the car without SWMBO knowing

  7. #77
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    109
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Rods / LLAMS / MSV Faultmate?

    Hi All,

    Now pardon my ignorance if this has already been covered elsewhere (I did check honest!), but I was wondering if anyone could advise if the Faultmate could also be used to adjust the 'normal' off road height to give additional height to the LLAMS or rods when just about to head off the beaten track?
    i.e. to adjust the suspension settings to give more offroad height, and then used again once back on the tarmac to reinstate the factory settings for the drive home.

    Obviously there's a few $$ difference between the Faultmate and the other options discussed, but the ability to do this (if it exists) in addition to the myriad of other benefits of the Faultmate would probably be sufficient to push me over the edge and take the plunge to order a Faultmate.

    Any guidance welcomed!!

    Thanks RickO

  8. #78
    RichardK is offline ChatterBox Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Western Australia
    Posts
    2,955
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I have both but haven't tried it, there is no need, the Llams gives the height with a twist of a knob, the rods need to be fitted in the case of GOE rods quite quikc and the Faultmate which I used prior to the Llams took a little longer than the rods.
    If you are thinking of using the Llams as well as the Faultmate then why? all you do is raise the suspension to an extent where it would be impractical and risking damage on the blacktop and not necessary offroad as you have the LR system in conjunction with the Llams.

    In my case I am totally happy with the Llams even though I also have a Faultmate.
    RichardK

    Series IV Matrix Offroad Camper following our Discovery 3 with E Diff, BAS Remap, Mitch Hitch, Uniden UHF, Codan NGT HF, Masten TPMS, Proquip Compressor Guard, ARB Winch Bar, Milemarker Hydraulic Winch, 4x4 Intelligence Rear Wheel Carrier, VMS GPS with Rear Camera,

  9. #79
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    109
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Thanks RichardK,

    I was only throwing the Faultmate into the mix as I do not presently have LLAMS, rods or a Faultmate and was trying to get the most bang for my buck.

    Sure having to fire up the Faultmate and change the settings would be a bit of a pain in the ar$e, but as I said the ability to get the additional lift when required (I was thinking of getting either the rods or LLAMS) would probably be enough to make me purchase a Faultmate.

    Thanks a mil,
    RickO

  10. #80
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW SW Slopes
    Posts
    12,030
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by AGRO View Post
    Does LR void any claims for suspension components, CVs, EAS or anything vaguely related when these after market items are installed and used.
    I know of a D2 that had a warranty claim rejected because of a 2" lift. The DC joint in the front tailshaft let go (at 17K kms IIRC) and did extensive damage to the gearbox and exhaust system. This joint was a known design weak point (mine let go at 40K kms) but LR would not budge. Hence I would not tempt fate and leave non-standard rods or a Llams module or loom fitted when submitting a suspension system warranty claim.

    Llams does not modify ecu values so there's nothing non-standard in the suspension ecu. However due to the modified sensor signals being PWM rather than pure analogue, with the vehicle not moving and even with Llams OFF, the signals waver just a little but enough to show-up on ecu diagnostic equipment as movement whereas unmodified signals are steady. The slightly unsteady height values could be incorrectly assumed to be faulty sensors by someone who does not know that Llams is fitted. I suggest that the loop-back plug be fitted in place of the module whenever the suspension ecu is going to be interrogated for faults. Tight tolerance mode operates properly and no suspension faults are recorded so the slight signal unsteadiness is obviously within acceptable limits.
    MY21.5 L405 D350 Vogue SE with 19s. Produce LLAMS for LR/RR, Jeep GC/Dodge Ram
    VK2HFG and APRS W1 digi, RTK base station using LoRa

Page 8 of 11 FirstFirst ... 678910 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!