Wow haha..what would be the point of the test if it didnt pass, "he guys i went for a swim with the new discovery today" [emoji23]
Printable View
You know you can't compare a 5th wheeler with a regular caravan . Put a Turntable on a Ute above the rear axle and wheels toward the rear of caravan and you can tow 4 x weight of tug if the brakes are accordingly specced.
If a semi trailer had wheels in the centre , like a caravan there would be rollovers on every corner.
A prime mover is a VERY different animal to a 4WD, It is designed Exclusively for one thing and one thing only and that is to tow heavy loads and the drivers are trained professionals.
4WD's and SUV's cannot be compared to a prime mover because they are nothing like one and in most cases the drivers towing their van around don't have the skill sets that the professional truckies have either.
further to prev reply, here are some photos of a Holden '5th wheeler' I saw at Boulia.
note the 'towball' is directly above rear axle , same as a prime mover , and trailer wheels are toward rear like a semi trailer . The trailer will also be fitted with Air Brakes .
You can not compare a regular 4x4 Ute and caravan to a Prime Mover / 5th wheeler .
This combo will be magnitudes safer than any 3500 kg rated 4x4 towing even a 2500kg caravan .
http://goingbush.com/images/h51.jpg
http://goingbush.com/images/h52.jpg
http://goingbush.com/images/h53.jpg
I am not disputing that a fifth wheel connection is different from a ball (or similar) coupling, but my point really was to ask the question - what is magic about the ratio of the trailer mass to that of the towing vehicle? Why 1:1? Why not 1.5:1? or some other number?
The safety of a trailer depends on a wide variety of factors, probably the most important being the weight distribution. But others are also important. For example, I regard the Citroen I sold a few years ago as one of the best tow vehicles I have driven (but limited by power and gearing) because the towbar is only about 15cm behind the back of the rear tyres, self levelling suspension, and no sideways play on the suspension.
I suppose it would be too much to expect that now the Americans have pulled out of manufacturing here that they took their terminology with them?
..so like many words in our limited increasingly generalist lexicon, SUV has come to mean nothing in particular. It’s pretty much any vehicle and it doesn’t even need to be 4x4. [bigwhistle]
Yes, they are lighter than the D4 is but they are not light. They are ~2200Kgs. vs ~2550Kgs for the D4. By shedding that weight LR have been able to increase the payload to over 900Kgs which is a massive increase and leaves every competitor in the dust (let's not mention the Patrol or LC 200 payloads). So, with that sort of payload in the vehicle I don't think there would be much of concern about the weight of the trailer. Also, keep in mind that the previous 110 kerb weight is 212Kgs lighter than the D5, the same concern never seems to be express for the Defender.
I don't think there'll be any issue for the new Defender.