Thread: Turbo 2H

Mate of mine has a 2H powered (?!) 47 Series. He was considering bolting a turbo on, now he has decided to sell it and buy something else. Possibly a 79 Series with 1HD-FTE power. Or an Amarok.

Originally Posted by BigJon

Mate of mine has a 2H powered (?!) 47 Series. He was considering bolting a turbo on, now he has decided to sell it and buy something else. Possibly a 79 Series with 1HD-FTE power. Or an Amarok.

Yea HJ47 will be a 2H

HDJ79 would be the best thing to roll out of Japan, none of the inherent problems....aside from a reverse cut front lux diff, but its in 4.1:1 not 4.3:1 like the N/A 79 which is alot weaker again.....also with the weak gearbag

Originally Posted by rovercare

Yea HJ47 will be a 2H

I wasn't questioning 2H, I was questiong power.

Originally Posted by BigJon

I wasn't questioning 2H, I was questiong power.

Yea, but seeing as though you think a rover V8 is an ampley powered beast

This thing has 7 psi and approx 630C Preturbo EGT's, so a very safe tune, got him to drive it, thinks its great......I think its still terrible

But alas, just a little more poke to tow a camper was needed

Originally Posted by rovercare

Yea, but seeing as though you think a rover V8 is an ampley powered beast

T

My current build 4.2 stroker will do in my Rangie, but the 355 Holden I am building for my WB should have real grunt.

Originally Posted by BigJon

My current build 4.2 stroker will do in my Rangie, but the 355 Holden I am building for my WB should have real grunt.

4.2 are a nicer engine than 4.6, must be a better bore x stroke ratio

Stick the 355 in the RR

The big single turbo LS1 the ute

We can all dream!

One big $$ gearbox is enough for me at this stage, I am keeping the RR a bit more realistic given it is a daily driver.

Originally Posted by BigJon

We can all dream!

One big $$ gearbox is enough for me at this stage, I am keeping the RR a bit more realistic given it is a daily driver.

With enough HP you'll only need a 2 speed, powerglide