Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 23

Thread: D2a V8 Catalytic Converters.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Hobart Tassie
    Posts
    167
    Total Downloaded
    0

    D2a V8 Catalytic Converters.

    G/day All

    i have done some searching but can't find my answer.....
    So Hopefully someone can help with the following questions.
    How restrictive are the cats on a d2a v8...
    You can buy HI FLOW cats....so how bad are the factory ones?
    Has anyone Changed to hi flow cats.....
    Has anyone removed cats/replaced with pipe....(Im not sure what the current laws are here in Tassie....
    but they (exhaust shops) would remove if car had done over 100 000klms.
    Is there any performance increase with the above mods......
    thanks Smally..

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Kingston, Tassie, OZ.
    Posts
    13,728
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Howdy!

    IMHO the cats aren't really the problem, the front pipes neck down immediately after the flange into 1, and this is where a fair bit of restriction etc begins. It'd be nice to fit some P38a engine pipes as these are a nice shape, and the 3 bolt flanges are quite freeflowing into the cats... but I reckon they'd be a drama to adapt as the chassis and crossmembers etc are in all the wrong places on a D2...

    The other option is to make another pair of engine pipes using the D1 system from the flanges and join into one pipe just at the Cat entrys, instead of at the flange. I may have some scrapped engine pipes soon if you want to experiment?

    Removing cats in these I reckon won't improve performance noticeably.

    A high flow main muffler may also help, have you noticed how the pipes neck down at the inlet and the outlet of each muffler?? Removing these issues will also improve matters.
    Bit noisier with the muffler changed, but I guess that isn't a worry

    JC
    The Isuzu 110. Solid and as dependable as a rock, coming soon with auto box😊
    The Range Rover L322 4.4.TTDV8 ....probably won't bother with the remap..😈

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    14,147
    Total Downloaded
    99.87 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by justinc View Post
    Howdy!

    IMHO the cats aren't really the problem, the front pipes neck down immediately after the flange into 1, and this is where a fair bit of restriction etc begins. It'd be nice to fit some P38a engine pipes as these are a nice shape, and the 3 bolt flanges are quite freeflowing into the cats... but I reckon they'd be a drama to adapt as the chassis and crossmembers etc are in all the wrong places on a D2...

    The other option is to make another pair of engine pipes using the D1 system from the flanges and join into one pipe just at the Cat entrys, instead of at the flange. I may have some scrapped engine pipes soon if you want to experiment?

    Removing cats in these I reckon won't improve performance noticeably.

    A high flow main muffler may also help, have you noticed how the pipes neck down at the inlet and the outlet of each muffler?? Removing these issues will also improve matters.
    Bit noisier with the muffler changed, but I guess that isn't a worry

    JC
    Great thoughts there JC.

    I've been looking into this for my Series V8 and was really surprised at what I found. time time time before I get onto it, but I've just uploaded some pics that I took showing the differences between the exhaust manifold to exhaust pipe joints - just stunning! I don't have P38 stuff unfortunately.

    Series V8 manifold:







    Disco1 V8:







    Disco2 V8:

    The Disco2 exhaust manifold outlet is very similar to the Disco1, but this is the exhaust pipe side of the manifold!





    Cheers
    Slunnie


    ~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Hobart Tassie
    Posts
    167
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Thanks JC
    I had a hi flow muffler fitted on friday,a slight increase in noise at idle, bit more of a growl on the highway...but i was expecting it to be a bit louder...(but my hearing isn't the best)...Anyway before i attack the rear resonator, i thought i would look at the cats....thinking these are holding back that V8 roar. & help with performance.....
    Cheers Smally

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Hobart Tassie
    Posts
    167
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Slunnie View Post
    Great thoughts there JC.

    I've been looking into this for my Series V8 and was really surprised at what I found. time time time before I get onto it, but I've just uploaded some pics that I took showing the differences between the exhaust manifold to exhaust pipe joints - just stunning! I don't have P38 stuff unfortunately.

    Series V8 manifold:


    [IMG]http://www.slunnie.com/coppermine/albums/LRV8exhausts/normal_P1030282.JPG[/IMG



    Disco1 V8:







    Disco2 V8:

    The Disco2 exhaust manifold outlet is very similar to the Disco1, but this is the exhaust pipe side of the manifold!





    Thanks Slunnie
    The d2 manifold sure looks more restrictive than the d1.

    I wasn't going to fit extractors to my d2 ,but that photo shows that the d2 would benefit more with extractors than my d1 i had....
    cheers smally

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    14,147
    Total Downloaded
    99.87 MB
    The manifolds themselves aren't bad, and the rest of the system apart from where it joins to the manifold is pretty good.

    What I was looking at doing was to use a D1 flange onto the D2 manifold and then go 2->1 which goes into the standard D2 exhaust which is large diameter already. The D2 flange is restrictive,will generate poor flow and is cheap.

    You have to have the CC's but if you wanted to further open things up I would look after the 2->1 which is after the CC's. I would also have a serious look at the induction system between the guard and the airbox which I think is the other restriction. The motor sucks more air than it blows and I suspect that passage would flow less than the exhaust after such modifications.
    Cheers
    Slunnie


    ~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~

  7. #7
    steve_35 Guest
    Dont get to carried away

    If you fit Extractors then fit a big exhaust on a stock engine it just kills the power and economy

    Decide witch end you want to work on front or back

    Just remember if its a V8 its only a little one and can be over exhausted really easy

    The best and cheapest way to go would be remove the rear muffler and fit a 2.5 inch pipe in its place
    You have basically shortened the exhaust by about 30-40 cm

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Hobart Tassie
    Posts
    167
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by steve_35 View Post
    Dont get to carried away

    If you fit Extractors then fit a big exhaust on a stock engine it just kills the power and economy

    Decide witch end you want to work on front or back

    Just remember if its a V8 its only a little one and can be over exhausted really easy

    The best and cheapest way to go would be remove the rear muffler and fit a 2.5 inch pipe in its place
    You have basically shortened the exhaust by about 30-40 cm
    G/day Steve
    I happy with the factory exhaust diameter im just trying to free it up & get a better flow....Which would give me a nice note & go a tad better....
    cheers smally

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    3,775
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Some of the comments on this thread are very interesting and a bit confusing. I have been considering fitting a set of extractors to my D2a as well, hoping for an increase in power.

    I'm not wanting to make it much louder, if at all, I'm more focused on looking for potential power improvement over standard.

    So the question is, do you just change the restrictive exhaust manifolds to extractors or do you need to change all or just some of the rest of the exhaust or is it a waste of time and money on the D2's because of other factors?

    I also have a 94 V8 D1 with a larger exhaust and free flowing mufflers including extractors that has been chipped and the old girl blows the doors off of the D2a. So why would a decent exhaust work on a D1 and not a D2?

    Any assistance here would be appreciated.

    cheers,
    Terry

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    On The Road
    Posts
    30,031
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by steve_35 View Post
    Dont get to carried away

    If you fit Extractors then fit a big exhaust on a stock engine it just kills the power and economy

    Decide witch end you want to work on front or back

    Just remember if its a V8 its only a little one and can be over exhausted really easy

    The best and cheapest way to go would be remove the rear muffler and fit a 2.5 inch pipe in its place
    You have basically shortened the exhaust by about 30-40 cm

    over exhausted??

    Puuuulease dont say we're talking back-pressure here,,,
    "How long since you've visited The Good Oil?"

    '93 V8 Rossi
    '97 to '07. sold.
    '01 V8 D2
    '06 to 10. written off.
    '03 4.6 V8 HSE D2a with Tornado ECM
    '10 to '21
    '16.5 RRS SDV8
    '21 to Infinity and Beyond!


    1988 Isuzu Bus. V10 15L NA Diesel
    Home is where you park it..

    [IMG][/IMG]

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!