Page 8 of 9 FirstFirst ... 6789 LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 87

Thread: Alternate engines for 01 D2 v8 petrol?

  1. #71
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    5,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Tank View Post
    When Carrol retired from racing after winning for Aston Martin at 24 Hours Le Mans, because of a crook heart he was contracted by Ford to build a competitive sports car, which he did with the small block Ford and AC body and chassis, while he was still in Europe, he shipped some engines over to UK, fitted them and then shipped the cars back to Ford for their approval, which he got. With Ford, Carrol developed the Daytona Coupe Cobra and had great sucess in the World Championship. Ford then gave Carrol an unlimited budget to develop the at that time unsucessful Ford GT40, which was powered by the small block 289cu.in. (4.7L). Shelby rebuilt the GT 40's and fitted the Ford FE series NASCAR 427 engine (7L), with a magnesium inlet manifold and single 4 bbl carby, detuned to 580bhp. Ford won Le Mans 24 that year finishing 1-2-3, trouncing Ferrari and did so for the next 3 years running. Carrol Shelby was then asked to build special Mustangs for sale through Ford known as the Ford Shelby Mustang. The only chevs in Carrol's life was the lame attempt by GM sponsored Jim Hall with his chev powered Chapparal race cars, Regards Frank

    this is a quote from the book "Daytona Cobra Coupes" if you do a little digging you will know this to be written by people there and then....

    "The original goal with Ford had been simple. At the Pikes Peak Hill Climb in Colorado, in july of 1961, Shelby had met Dave Evans, then the head of product planning for Ford,and told him about a car he wanted to build to challenge the Chevrolet Corvettes. What he needed, said Shelby, was an engine. He confided to Evan's that he had originally approached Chevrolet with his plan ( because Chevy's light 283 V-8 had seemed an ideal choice to fit a chassis he had in mind), but had been rebuffed. Chevrolet, he was told, didnt need a challenger to the Corvette"


    NB the Chevrolte 283 was one of, if not, the first production engine to make 1hp per cubic inch


    Ford GT40:

    Le Mans finishing record:

    1966 1st, 2nd, 3rd by 427 mark II's
    1967 1st, 4th by 427 mark II's
    1968 1st by 302
    1969 1st, 3rd by 302

    cheers,
    Serg

  2. #72
    Discostik Guest
    Hi all,

    I am the friend of the original poster (ie the bloke with the possible cracked head or block) I was told by AMV Landrover that it would be cheaper (ie 8-$9000) to drop a 4.6 in my car rather then repairing my current 4.0ltr engine. However i have recently invested the help of a friend of mine from Pearl Automotive who is helping me repair my current engine with a worst case scenario rebuild cost of $3-$4000. As i was never looking for an increase in power etc and with the hope of keeping costs to a minimum and an increased reliability some of the suggestions of 600hp+ engines, while appreciated and dream worthy, are not really economically or practically viable.

    Thanks for all the thought guys and i look forward to some further discussions via the forum as i can now access internet properly

    Will keep you posted as my rebuild progresses

    Cheers

  3. #73
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney, you know. The olympic one.
    Posts
    4,853
    Total Downloaded
    0
    What does their $4000- rebuild include? If you've heated it enough to crack a head or loosen sleeves then your only real option for the block is to resleeve and to do that without using top hat sleeves is asking for trouble.

    TR Spares in Syd quoted $3500- for a hatted 4.6 short motor about a year ago when I was looking (ended up finding a 10000km 4.6 for $2200).It will be a lot dearer to rebuld yours as a 4.6 as you are replacing a lot of big $$$ items. $8-9000 would be a good rebuild incl all parts for a 4.6, it cost me less that $2600 incl the purchase price of the engine to fit. I bought new gaskets for everything, head studs (a definate if you are rebuilding, don't even think about using the TTY bolts), new timing chain and rockers and shafts. Just need to shop around and keep an eye on ebay and you can save some real $$$.

  4. #74
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    ArmidaleNSW
    Posts
    160
    Total Downloaded
    0
    If your really attached to the D2, then i think the 4.6 is the choice, but make sure its been top hatted, other wise just get rid of it, put the $8-9K towards a P38 or D3 if you are sticking with LR.

  5. #75
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    5,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    rememeber when either in real life or on the internet to compare apples with apples...

    make sure all parts are of equal quality and performance.
    make sure all work is done to the same level of workmanship
    make sure same amount of work/parts done

    Serg

  6. #76
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Moruya Heads/Sth. Coast, NSW
    Posts
    6,532
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by uninformed View Post
    this is a quote from the book "Daytona Cobra Coupes" if you do a little digging you will know this to be written by people there and then....

    "The original goal with Ford had been simple. At the Pikes Peak Hill Climb in Colorado, in july of 1961, Shelby had met Dave Evans, then the head of product planning for Ford,and told him about a car he wanted to build to challenge the Chevrolet Corvettes. What he needed, said Shelby, was an engine. He confided to Evan's that he had originally approached Chevrolet with his plan ( because Chevy's light 283 V-8 had seemed an ideal choice to fit a chassis he had in mind), but had been rebuffed. Chevrolet, he was told, didnt need a challenger to the Corvette"


    NB the Chevrolte 283 was one of, if not, the first production engine to make 1hp per cubic inch


    Ford GT40:

    Le Mans finishing record:

    1966 1st, 2nd, 3rd by 427 mark II's
    1967 1st, 4th by 427 mark II's
    1968 1st by 302
    1969 1st, 3rd by 302

    cheers,
    Serg
    Totally different story as told by Carroll Shelby on a Discovery channel Doco a few weeks back, so Carroll must have been lying in this doco, who do you believe, I have seen a few different docos on the subject and they all seem to back up Shelby's version, the truth is out there somewhere, Regards frank.

  7. #77
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    5,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Tank View Post
    Totally different story as told by Carroll Shelby on a Discovery channel Doco a few weeks back, so Carroll must have been lying in this doco, who do you believe, I have seen a few different docos on the subject and they all seem to back up Shelby's version, the truth is out there somewhere, Regards frank.
    Docos done for TV generally arnt as indepth as books (the decent books), especially considering the time and reasearch that goes into them...then you have the editors who have to package the whole thing together....and then who is behind (money) the doco...will sway what info is and isnt included..

    FYI the authors of said book are:

    Peter Brock
    David Friedman
    George Stauffer

    foreword by Carroll Shelby
    Introduction by Bob Bondurant

    those are some names that should ring some bells....

    the Ford GT40 book I have is written by Ronnie Spain....

    BTW you never replied to my comments regarding the Ford F1 engine being built of the V-8? and that cosworth did infact build their own engines from scratch....

    personaly I think your seeing things a little to black and white...ford have their backing or name on an engine doesnt mean they produce it etc etc etc

    I also think the original point was missed...I feel Brian was stating that the 350 is the most successfull production engine in racing...

    not a brand, not full on 1 off custom cast race engines...just the use of the basic block and achitecture in motor sport...I dont know, but Id say it would be pretty close...

  8. #78
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Moruya Heads/Sth. Coast, NSW
    Posts
    6,532
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by uninformed View Post
    Docos done for TV generally arnt as indepth as books (the decent books), especially considering the time and reasearch that goes into them...then you have the editors who have to package the whole thing together....and then who is behind (money) the doco...will sway what info is and isnt included..

    FYI the authors of said book are:

    Peter Brock
    David Friedman
    George Stauffer

    foreword by Carroll Shelby
    Introduction by Bob Bondurant

    those are some names that should ring some bells....

    the Ford GT40 book I have is written by Ronnie Spain....

    BTW you never replied to my comments regarding the Ford F1 engine being built of the V-8? and that cosworth did infact build their own engines from scratch....

    personaly I think your seeing things a little to black and white...ford have their backing or name on an engine doesnt mean they produce it etc etc etc

    I also think the original point was missed...I feel Brian was stating that the 350 is the most successfull production engine in racing...

    not a brand, not full on 1 off custom cast race engines...just the use of the basic block and achitecture in motor sport...I dont know, but Id say it would be pretty close...
    It's ironic that Pete Brock designed the Ford/Shelby Daytona Coupe and Our Peter Brock was killed driving a replica Daytona coupe.
    I'm not sure what you mean about the Ford F1 engine, it started life as a 289 small block and advanced to the Indy quad cam engine. When Offy people threw a hissy fit about being dragged into the 20th century the indy engines were limited to 168 cu. in. so Ford downsisized their existing indy motor to 168cubes, hung a hairdryer off it and blew the Offy's into extinction.
    I will quote a paragraph from Pat Ganahl's book Ford Performance.
    Quote: "After Ford's suprising sucess with the stock rockerarm small block at Indianapolis in '63, they turned their engineers loose on one of the most sophisticated projects ever concocted, the Dual Overhead Cam Ford engine. Using the same basic 90 degreeV, 255-inch block (cast of aluminum (sic)), they added a pair of aluminum heads with four gear driven overhead cams, four valves per cylinder, and Hilborn fuel injectors.
    It was designed strictly for racing (it has never been offered in a production Ford) and it has been eminently sucessful." End Quote.
    When Ford dropped Racing, A.J. Foyt took over this engine and it became the worlds winnigest F1 engine, Cosworth became involved with Fords engine after it was developed and raced sucessfully, they (Cosworth) were partners with Ford on the F1 scene, Regards Frank.

  9. #79
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    5,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    good info there Frank.

    in what form/s did the ford engine race in F1

    when you say the most winning engine in F1, do you mean the brand Ford or the particular engine by Ford?

    from what I know Schu'ys car ran a V6.....

    cheers,
    Serg

  10. #80
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Northern Beaches
    Posts
    1,426
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by uninformed View Post
    from what I know Schu'ys car ran a V6.....
    Nope, 91 - 94 it was a Ford/Zetec 75° V8, developed by Cosworth but bankrolled by Ford, not based on the DFV however, or the 289 either. 95 he had a Renault V10.

    Jeff


Page 8 of 9 FirstFirst ... 6789 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!