What a revelation!!! I took the Disco for a short drive to get up to operating temperature then gave it a run up my test hill with Nanocom recording fuelling. With the old MAF I recorded a peak air flow reading of 414 kg/hr, and the Disco sounded as rough as it has been for weeks - almost like it was running on four cylinders below 2500rpm.
After a quick trip home to change the MAF I drove back to the test hill. As soon as I started the car the difference was obvious, and when I took off down the street it was apparent the roughness was gone. I'm relieved that I hadn't wasted $140.00 on a new MAF and very, very happy at the improvement in drivability. Checking the nanocom recordings peak airflow up the test hill is now 515 kg/hr using roughly same amount of throttle.
With the old MAF I only managed over 500 kg/hr up a long hill that required full throttle to maintain 110kph.
Interestingly the warm idle airflow readings are pretty much the same for both MAF's. Even so with the new MAF the D2 seems to idle more smoothly.
I did notice that the new MAF was a tighter fit into both the airbox and turbo inlet hoses. Perhaps the MAF body deforms due to clamping pressure with age and develops air leaks?
cheers
Paul



Reply With Quote





Bookmarks