JC, great info, thanks.
So for drivability, longevity of engine and drivetrain and dollars, would you recommend TD5 of 4bd1T?
Dave.
I am not a fan of the 3-53. Though they do seem to be strong and can be built for serious output and high revs.
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z16LFkBwYHQ"]detroit diesel 353 T dyno run - YouTube[/ame]
I like the worked TD5 idea. Didn't Laras in Belguim already do the same...?
A 4BD1(T) could be built for the same power with (presumably)better reliability though. However the torque-pulse/vibration issue needs to be overcome - e.g. with a heavier flywheel...
One of these (or a 6BD1T) would be amazing...
Fast forward to 0:45
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A_rqizXl6CA]Land Rover 90 Cummins 6BT 6.0 Liter Truck Engine - YouTube[/ame]
JC, great info, thanks.
So for drivability, longevity of engine and drivetrain and dollars, would you recommend TD5 of 4bd1T?
Dave.
Yep, making huge power too.
Custom crank, Carillo style rods, 2.8 litres, header style exh manifold etc.
I was only reading the old Pirate thread the other night when I couldn't sleep.
[edit]
http://www.pirate4x4.com/forum/land-...ou-got-up.htmlFirstly, my engine is a very modified TD5,
New crank with 100mm stroke,
New Carrillo type rods 5.5mm shorter than std,
New pistons + 0.020"
New up rated head and mains bolts,
Lead copper bearings on main and big ends.
Ported head,
Garret 2559v variable vane turbo on one off tubular manifold.
Other boring stuff etc etc.
256bhp, 590nm torque. Rolling road proven!
I mentioned the 3-53 because Dave expressed concerns about weight. I would go with a 4BD1T with the wick turned up and a wet intercooler from Frozen boost.
A 3-53T, by the way, in industrial continuous rating is 131 hp at 2500 using N45 injectors. Up it to 3-53TABB with N90 injectors and 3200 rpm and you have a whole different ball game.
Given the hundreds if not thousands of posts on Aulro detailing TD5 problems, there is no way I would consider owning such an unreliable, troublesome, expensive engine, let alone a highly modified one.
URSUSMAJOR
Not JC, but I have driven a few TD5s and pumas (only been a passenger in TDV6s), and I am always happy to get back to driving my 4BD1+T. The low down torque of the 4BD1 just makes it so much nicer to drive offroad, or at low speed.
4BD1s manage 500k-1M km between rebuilds, even if not looked after particularly well. TD5s are a good engine, but not quite in that league IMHO (despite the excellent oil filtration).
td5 is certainly smoother and more sympathetic of drivetrain, and lets face it looked after it'll see 500k, but driven hard a 4bd1t will do all this and still see 750k.....
like ben, i get a great feeling driving my 4bd1 110 that i don't get with a td5 engined one, even a chipped one .
it's an isuzu thing i reckonlike the difference between a xr250 and an xr600. the 250 will be fine, but the 600 is better and you can never go back
and for the record, i think the td5 is still one of the best diesel engines produced in the eu2/3 era.
jc
The Isuzu 110. Solid and as dependable as a rock, coming soon with auto box😊
The Range Rover L322 4.4.TTDV8 ....probably won't bother with the remap..😈
Isuzurover, thanks to you as well. I was thanking JC, but was disconnected 3 times and by the time my rply came up, you had posted ;-)
It's all good.
Thanks for the input, all.
Keep the numbers coming for posterity, though.
Dave.
I wish you blokes wouldn't keep talking like this, I had myself convinced a TD5 was in my future although as Steve said the other night, I'll probably persist with the Tdi for years to come.
The damned thing scored a new vacuum pump a few weeks ago, and it's getting a new alternator tomorrow now.....
Thanks again JC.
I was vacilating between 'old-school' no electronics, WVO drinking, chuggin' 4b and a refined light new school.
Cheers.
There is never a substitute for cubic capacity.
I've never been a fan of trying to wring a 2.5 diesel engine's neck to get HP and torque out of it: something is bound to break.
The Amarok failed DISMALLY in Africa: I doubt if it would handle the Outback any better.
No, 3.1L is the smallest turbo diesel I would consider for a defender and I'd be happy when I don't need to continually boost @ > 20 PSI and rev the guts out of it.
A turbo is a poor substitute for CC: the bigger the turbo, the more the lag the heat and the risk of failure.
If only we could get a decent, cheap blower for a turbo diesel? I really think a blower is perfect for diesel engines.
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks