Page 11 of 29 FirstFirst ... 91011121321 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 110 of 286

Thread: Ashcroft Force 9, is there anything better?

  1. #101
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    3,394
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by clubagreenie View Post
    Yes but the dry sump sump is only maybe 2" deep. The one used in the latest model that they've run in GT Le Mans category. They run the stock dry sump setup it's actually really well done for factory, I think it's a 5 stage + pressure.
    Thanks mate, any negatives of running this setup with the 556hp LSA?

  2. #102
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast, QLD
    Posts
    3,570
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The only negative I can see is the engine weight. But I am assuming the LSA is a cast engine block?

    Other then that I have been watching the firestorm builds over at LRA and they are pimp.
    I rule!!!

    2.4" of Pure FURY!!!

  3. #103
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    3,394
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Grimace View Post
    The only negative I can see is the engine weight. But I am assuming the LSA is a cast engine block?

    Other then that I have been watching the firestorm builds over at LRA and they are pimp.
    Aluminum ..yes they are unreal!

    Was refering to the 2inch sump, would that hold enough oil etc for the engine

  4. #104
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Yinnar South, Vic
    Posts
    9,943
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by blackrangie View Post
    Aluminum ..yes they are unreal!

    Was refering to the 2inch sump, would that hold enough oil etc for the engine
    It's just a collection pan, you run external tank and pump

  5. #105
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    preston
    Posts
    342
    Total Downloaded
    0
    For the India being sloshed around could you not retube gu gear to use off the shelf innards (albeit cal gear etc)
    Abs is a workaround but were talking massive electrical changes just with ecu intergration
    Dc

  6. #106
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Yinnar South
    Posts
    104
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by blackrangie View Post
    Thats a very good point and i think LRA are confident with the full Ashcroft front end at this stage, but if it does go then it would be the 9" that would be going in.
    even with Ashcroft gear in the front the crownwheel and pinion are going to hate over 500hp. Even pegging the diff will only help so much

  7. #107
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    3,394
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by moparrangie View Post
    even with Ashcroft gear in the front the crownwheel and pinion are going to hate over 500hp. Even pegging the diff will only help so much
    Thats what im afraid of, but for the front i think we will try the rover centre with ashcroft everything pegged and hi tough, if something goes then plan B which will involve the 9" up front

  8. #108
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    3,394
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Rear at this stage is 9 centre, rover tubes, hi tough axles 31-24spline, upgraded flanges, then if axle fails at 24 end move up to 35-35spline with upgraded spindles , bored out hub with bigger bearings and 35spline flange.Unless someone can confirm where i can currently buy spindles and flages now to suit?

  9. #109
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney, you know. The olympic one.
    Posts
    4,853
    Total Downloaded
    0
    You'll have heaps of clearance for just about any diff. There's an external oil pump and I think 5 scavenge sections, these collect oil from all around the engine. As an example in a race application I'll have them front and rear of each head and 4 or so in the sump. This sends the oil to a collection tank which has to be designed correctly (your first downside). It will de-aerate the oil and start to cool it down. The tank for your application will need to be custom made/designed to fit and work correctly. The benefit is you run a lot more oil so it's cooler and in a regular application you may be able to extend change intervals. From there, it's pumped from the tank by the pressure section of the pump, drawn through an external cooler then the pump an into the engine oil circuit.

    The pump should bolt straight onto the engine and the stock factory system was run in ALMS and at Le Mans so it should be fine. There's a heap of lines to organise but again, as it's factory it'll be neat and you won't need to make up much If anything.

  10. #110
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    3,394
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by clubagreenie View Post
    You'll have heaps of clearance for just about any diff. There's an external oil pump and I think 5 scavenge sections, these collect oil from all around the engine. As an example in a race application I'll have them front and rear of each head and 4 or so in the sump. This sends the oil to a collection tank which has to be designed correctly (your first downside). It will de-aerate the oil and start to cool it down. The tank for your application will need to be custom made/designed to fit and work correctly. The benefit is you run a lot more oil so it's cooler and in a regular application you may be able to extend change intervals. From there, it's pumped from the tank by the pressure section of the pump, drawn through an external cooler then the pump an into the engine oil circuit.

    The pump should bolt straight onto the engine and the stock factory system was run in ALMS and at Le Mans so it should be fine. There's a heap of lines to organise but again, as it's factory it'll be neat and you won't need to make up much If anything.
    Awesome info!

Page 11 of 29 FirstFirst ... 91011121321 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!