Page 23 of 29 FirstFirst ... 132122232425 ... LastLast
Results 221 to 230 of 286

Thread: Ashcroft Force 9, is there anything better?

  1. #221
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney, you know. The olympic one.
    Posts
    4,853
    Total Downloaded
    0






    Not sure of the website but there's still current talk on forums about them and seems supplies are still available.

  2. #222
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    3,394
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by clubagreenie View Post






    Not sure of the website but there's still current talk on forums about them and seems supplies are still available.

  3. #223
    2stroke Guest
    Pretty good if you like your diff in the middle, I remember Pete Antunac had that style of thing in the rear of his original FJ40 thing.

  4. #224
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Goolwa SA - but top ender forever
    Posts
    2,515
    Total Downloaded
    0
    they turned independent suspension into beam axle keeping all the same parts. personally I would go for portals as there is more ground clearance

  5. #225
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by blitz View Post
    they turned independent suspension into beam axle keeping all the same parts. personally I would go for portals as there is more ground clearance
    The option above is better for high speed applications.

  6. #226
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    5,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by isuzurover View Post
    The option above is better for high speed applications.
    actually IFS/IRS is better for that

    To me they are just overly complex live axles that the negs outway the positives.

    There isnt any normal 4x4 that would be easy to mount them under at a resonable height that would not require major major work. The same work could produce something better. And any custom buggy etc can be built better with other types of axles.

  7. #227
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney, you know. The olympic one.
    Posts
    4,853
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Actually they're a bolt in for jeeps (of course), options for new chassis mounts for longer arms, redesigned sump to get even more up travel. The CV's and shafts are the same as used for most premium buggy/truck trans axle applications. You'd be hard pressed to break them as they're landed on for great heights full tilt.

    How are they "complex" live axles? There's a centre, axles and CV's. The cover comes off the back so you don not need to pull anything to change axles/CV's. And the cover isn't structural so there's an indication of how well they're built.

  8. #228
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by uninformed View Post
    actually IFS/IRS is better for that

    To me they are just overly complex live axles that the negs outway the positives.

    There isnt any normal 4x4 that would be easy to mount them under at a resonable height that would not require major major work. The same work could produce something better. And any custom buggy etc can be built better with other types of axles.
    I'm not saying I like them, just that most portals do not like extended highway use at 80+ km/h. Those things don't have reduction gears to generate heat.

  9. #229
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    3,394
    Total Downloaded
    0
    LRA have just built their first Rover9..just got sent these shots by Andrew showing quick test fit with rear adjustable johnny jointed trailing arms and aluminum low pinion 9" :thumbup:
    Attached Images Attached Images

  10. #230
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    5,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by clubagreenie View Post
    Actually they're a bolt in for jeeps (of course), options for new chassis mounts for longer arms, redesigned sump to get even more up travel. The CV's and shafts are the same as used for most premium buggy/truck trans axle applications. You'd be hard pressed to break them as they're landed on for great heights full tilt.

    How are they "complex" live axles? There's a centre, axles and CV's. The cover comes off the back so you don not need to pull anything to change axles/CV's. And the cover isn't structural so there's an indication of how well they're built.
    Bolt in? where do the coil springs land? How is normal ride height maintained, or up travel with that high centre section? Seriously I can not see them bolting in with out other mods.

    More complex with more moving parts and sealed compartments. If they represented value for money OR a improvement over other options regarless of cost, they would be way more popular than they are.

Page 23 of 29 FirstFirst ... 132122232425 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!