Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 30

Thread: fuel econ

  1. #11
    Davo is offline ChatterBox Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    2,595
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I took our brand new work V8 Landcruiser diesel for a 500km run last Friday . . . it seems like it did 18l/100km!

    I suppose it needs to be run in . . .

  2. #12
    RonMcGr Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Davo View Post
    I took our brand new work V8 Landcruiser diesel for a 500km run last Friday . . . it seems like it did 18l/100km!

    I suppose it needs to be run in . . .
    I know a guy with a LC V8, he would be happy with that

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourn(ish)
    Posts
    26,503
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by RonMcGr View Post
    Dave,

    Interesting that you should mention "obscene fuel figure".

    That is exactly what mine did when I first bought it.

    Q. Problem?
    A. Faulty advance retard unit.

    Kingyrules,

    Take the plastic pipe off the advance retard unit and suck on it. If you get no resistance, there is your first problem

    Cheers
    yeah thats fine on a petrol engine but diesels dont got that. the 20l/100 was for the new diesel pootrols and toymotas, something about needing to have the most powerful engine in its class.....

    So gald I can do all of what they can do with just a piddly 2.5l 5 pot.
    Dave

    "In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."

    For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.

    Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
    Tdi autoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
    Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)


    If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
    If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.

  4. #14
    RonMcGr Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Blknight.aus View Post
    yeah thats fine on a petrol engine but diesels dont got that. the 20l/100 was for the new diesel pootrols and toymotas, something about needing to have the most powerful engine in its class.....

    So gald I can do all of what they can do with just a piddly 2.5l 5 pot.
    Really!!

    I thought the Jap diesels did better that that

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Pialba, Qld (near Hervey Bay)
    Posts
    288
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Talking

    This is just the thread I've been looking for as am seriously looking at a 98/99 Disco 1 3.9L. I used to have an Explorer 4.0L SOHC V6 & got between 540 to 560k's per 80L tank on the open road. In town, I don't want to even talk about. That seems to be similar to what some are saying but not others. I learnt that sitting on or just under 100kph's lowers your usage quite a bit on a long run.
    I've also learnt on a 2.6L 1989 Paj that extractors DO make a difference but haven't had a chance to test the "straight through" exhaust as yet.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by RonMcGr View Post
    Really!!

    I thought the Jap diesels did better that that
    They might do if you drive them really really nicely. But lots of power is the ability to burn lots of fuel.
    Toyota claim something like 10.5km/l for the 200 series diesel.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    330
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I get around 19-21l / 100km in the city (heavy traffic) and about 15-16l / 100km on the highway.
    97 D1 V8 SE manual - loud & locked - RPI Optimax & some toys
    09 D3 HSE
    Sold and missed: 03 D2a V8 auto

    LROCV member

    I love it when a plan comes together!
    John "Hannibal" Smith

  8. #18
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Brisneyland once again
    Posts
    902
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I got 706km out of 92L on the trip at x-mas ( took 20L in a Jerry so I could go as far as I was game....lol). that equated to 13.03L per 100k.
    And just for the sceptics, that was using FFI fuel pills.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by twitchy View Post
    I got 706km out of 92L on the trip at x-mas ( took 20L in a Jerry so I could go as far as I was game....lol). that equated to 13.03L per 100k.
    And just for the sceptics, that was using FFI fuel pills.
    A mate with a couple of P38's (and a handful of classics too) says his fuel computer drops to around 13l/100km on the flat at 100km/h.

    But I bet it drops off the scale when you put the boot in.

    I found a 4L V6 hilux can be easily kept reading 2km/l (50l/100km) on a hill.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Kalamunda, Western Australia
    Posts
    301
    Total Downloaded
    0

    feeuwl

    As has been said before, if ya buying a V8 dont expect great economy!! I have an 89 Rangie wirth the 3.5 which is getting about 440km from a tank, which to me is average. When we want economy we take the Td5 Disco which will deliver 700 - 800km per tank.
    Shano

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!