Pretty much verging on a bogus test, whatever mag published it should hang their heads, it doesn't really prove anything except who has the best Falex #'s.
A Falex test hasn't got a hell of a lot of relevance for motor oils, like the Timken test and 4 ball test, it's primarily aimed at greases.
F'rinstance, I have a full synthetic ester engine oil here that blows all those tested samples away in a Falex test and it was developed way back in 1990 or 91 (I used it from '93 through '95 in race engines)
BTW it's viscosity is 0W-5, and I can tell you that some serious surface finish and clearance changes need to be made to reduce rapid wear, but it has excellent Falex test results, better than it's 10W-30, 15W-40 and 20W-50 then stable mates and better than all other synthetic engine oils I'd ever seen Falex tested back then. The problem was that good falex #'s don't correlate to less engine wear, in my case wear increased until I changed things significantly internally.
BTW, I could also add some bleach like White King to any of those oils and it would dramatically improve it's Falex test #'s, but I don't think that would do an engine much good.


 
						
					 
					
					 Originally Posted by nsgnomad
 Originally Posted by nsgnomad
					
 
				 
				
				
				
					 Reply With Quote
  Reply With Quote 
						
					 
						
					
 
				
 
						
					 i use HPR15....should i be using HPR5?
i use HPR15....should i be using HPR5? 
						
					 
						
					
Bookmarks