Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 28 of 28

Thread: Engine Ideas for 82 classic rangie

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    St Helena,Melbourne
    Posts
    16,777
    Total Downloaded
    1.13 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by lokka View Post
    Preaty sure marks adaptors did a kit to fit the 3.8 dunny dore engin in a rangie if not it should be a near straight bolt up there both buick style blocks and the 3.8 from the series 1 vn with a modded chip like my bros old VN would be a ball tearer in a rangie and would give good economy
    The holden V6 uses the GM corporate fwd small bellhousing pattern so is completely different to the rover which uses a pre 1964 buick/olds/pontiac bellhousing pattern. I have 2 x Buick V6's which use the 64 up BOP pattern which is unique again but close to a SBC. You would need to use the T700 with the V6 and a marks T700 to LT230 adapter to make it fit.
    This is a buick V6 with toyota 5spd attached using a multifit housing, SBC holes are the ones not used.
    MY08 TDV6 SE D3- permagrin ooh yeah
    2004 Jayco Freedom tin tent
    1998 Triumph Daytona T595
    1974 VW Kombi bus
    1958 Holden FC special sedan

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,665
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by 82rangie View Post
    hows it goin guys, just wanting to find out a few options for an engine conversion in my range, its a 2dr with the 3.5 v8 pretty gutless so looking for bit more grunt cheers
    Quote Originally Posted by 82rangie View Post
    Well yeah i'm looking fairly cheap hopefully lol, but im looking for sumthing with more grunt and thats fuel injected
    Quote Originally Posted by 82rangie View Post
    im at camira and the budget is probably only 1000-1500
    Quote Originally Posted by 82rangie View Post
    what would i be looking at for something powerful, yet fairly economical?
    Engine Conversion summary.
    1. Looking for a bit more Grunt.
    2. Fuel Injected.
    3. $1,000 to $1,500 budget.
    4. Powerful.
    5. fairly ecconomical.

    Not asking for much!

    A "Marks Adapter" would cost more than your total budget at 3.
    The ECU from most cars even from a wrecker can be more than your total budget.

    Engineers certificate required at end of project. $250 - $500. Balance left to conduct project $1,000 - $1,250. I paid more than that on my last major service.

    Lots of luck with your project

    Diana

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  3. #23
    GuyG's Avatar
    GuyG is offline ChatterBox Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    2,001
    Total Downloaded
    0
    What gearbox are you running?
    98 Harvey the tractor - 300 tdi Defender Wagon
    84 Alfetta GTV

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melrose SA
    Posts
    2,838
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Cam and lifters are within you budget provided it isnt completely stuffed it will surprise you

  5. #25
    RR5L Guest
    If your going to do the cam and lifters, do yourself a favour whilst you got the front of the engine striped down and change the timing chain and sprockets. Over time the chain stretches altering the timing.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melrose SA
    Posts
    2,838
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The timing chain and sprockets is or should be part of the cam and lifter job.
    Dont use the standard crap gears and chain use an aftermarket quality duplex chain and steel sprockets

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Brisbane, Inner East.
    Posts
    11,178
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by mark2 View Post
    I couldnt live with the torque output of a standard Holden V6 in a heavy 4WD - the peak is way too high up in the rev range for my liking. An auto would probably disguise it however.

    I once ordered a work ute (VS commodore) with a manual box and was very dissapointed with it. The auto ones went heaps better and were a lot more pleasant to drive.
    When GM-H introduced the VN with the Buick V6 they planned to only build manual transmission cars against dealer order, not for stock. They estimated that 95% of production would be auto. transmissions. Np doubt the power curve was tailored to this end. With an auto box they have impesssive low speed performance.
    URSUSMAJOR

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    St Helena,Melbourne
    Posts
    16,777
    Total Downloaded
    1.13 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by Brian Hjelm View Post
    When GM-H introduced the VN with the Buick V6 they planned to only build manual transmission cars against dealer order, not for stock. They estimated that 95% of production would be auto. transmissions. Np doubt the power curve was tailored to this end. With an auto box they have impesssive low speed performance.
    They have such a ****y little flywheel i'm not suprised as a manual they would be a slug, my Buick V6 has a full sized V8 flywheel - the holden (FWD pattern )version is about the same size as a 186 flywheel.
    MY08 TDV6 SE D3- permagrin ooh yeah
    2004 Jayco Freedom tin tent
    1998 Triumph Daytona T595
    1974 VW Kombi bus
    1958 Holden FC special sedan

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!