Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 62

Thread: Ultra flexi coils

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Sydney, West
    Posts
    1,241
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I have 12.8 inch travel Rancho shocks and my coil still dislocates but only just, my rear coils have a free height of 530mm and should be fine with a 12 inch shock. As for the ride my car rides better now than when I had the old two inch lift. I am thinking of upgrading to 14 inch travel rears and putting my old rears to the front external mount.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Western Sydney
    Posts
    2,182
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Post

    Quote Originally Posted by Benny_IIA View Post
    Im running 5000's with 14.3" stroke.

    With my 3" inch sus stuff coils it still drops below the cones which can cause problems .

    Im going back to std rear coils and 2" fronts. the fix the relocation problems.


    As the std coils have a much shorter free lenght meaning the axle is much closer to level when the cone goes back in.


    Also mine drives like a peice of **** with the lift.


    14" is around the max the rover rear end can flex
    With that amount of travel in your shocks,your standard rear coils will just dislocate further.I think you will be better off by having your coils so that they don't dislocate,which will also add to stability off road.
    The rear spring locators that I use,allow my rear coils to dislocate no more than 2" before they are captured.
    2" lift on a Defender/County is plenty,just needs to be set up properly.If you want/need more travel in the front,you need to start thinking about something like a 3 link setup.

    Wayne

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Sydney, West
    Posts
    1,241
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Lowranger, I agree with your statement, defenders don't really need big lifts, a three inch lifted defender(mine) has the same ground clearance as a (my friends) Patrol with 2 inch body lift, 6 inch coil lift and running 35 inch tyre's, now to some having this much ground clearance may seem a bit extreme but I prefer to keep my chassis and sills of the rocks and believe that a 3 inch lift on a 110 is about perfect provided you are running a wider wheel track ie negative 25 offset rims or the likes. I like to climb rocky mountains and washed out hills where the clearance is good to have, a dedicated touring vehicle dose not need such a high lift and also come down to personal preference.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Western Sydney
    Posts
    2,182
    Total Downloaded
    0
    not only will you have as much clearance,but you will have as much,if not more suspension travel.I think,that looking at the photographs you vehicle,and mine have pretty much the same suspension travel,even though they are set up differently.And yes,I agree that widening the track,with offset rims,adds to the stability,and certainly the feeling of incar stability.I have -25mm offset rims with 35s as my prefered offroad setup.As my vehicle is primarily set up for the same use as your vehicle.But when used as a touring vehicle,I do go back to running 33's,as these are far easier to find if needed in more remote areas.

    Wayne

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Sydney, West
    Posts
    1,241
    Total Downloaded
    0
    It dose have more travel, I inquired about getting some Tough Dog big bore adjustable shocks and the longest they made to suit the 6 and 7 inch lift cruiser or patrol had only a travel length of 290mm which is not as much as my Rancho's, I thought that was very strange all lifted up and no travel.

    You say you run 35's some times, what gearbox do you have.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Cessnock NSW
    Posts
    1,506
    Total Downloaded
    0
    So tough dog do not hav enough travel , ranchos hav enough, what about procomp ? I think I might still go 14" bilsteins and mount them on different brakets ! ?

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    1,243
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by LowRanger View Post

    With that amount of travel in your shocks,your standard rear coils will just dislocate further.I think you will be better off by having your coils so that they don't dislocate,which will also add to stability off road.
    The rear spring locators that I use,allow my rear coils to dislocate no more than 2" before they are captured.
    2" lift on a Defender/County is plenty,just needs to be set up properly.If you want/need more travel in the front,you need to start thinking about something like a 3 link setup.

    Wayne
    due the axle walking forward during down travel and the free lenght of the 3 inch coild being very long, when it comes time for the spring to relocate the cone is on the out side of spring.


    But when using a spring with a much shorter free lenght ie stock spring, the axle has moved back enough when it is time for the cone to do its thing.

    I doubt my springs would strech enough to run them retained

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    1,243
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by c.h.i.e.f View Post
    So tough dog do not hav enough travel , ranchos hav enough, what about procomp ? I think I might still go 14" bilsteins and mount them on different brakets ! ?
    yes pro comp do long lenghts up to 14"

    but they are not a patch on bilsteins (im running 5000 billy's 14.3")

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Sydney, West
    Posts
    1,241
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Chief, pro comp have them in the right length, cal415 runs pro comp

    Benny_ IIA, your next mod should be to cut the rear control arm brackets off and move them forward to gain longer control arms, I have been thinking of this lately.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Western Sydney
    Posts
    2,182
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Benny_IIA View Post
    due the axle walking forward during down travel and the free lenght of the 3 inch coild being very long, when it comes time for the spring to relocate the cone is on the out side of spring.


    But when using a spring with a much shorter free lenght ie stock spring, the axle has moved back enough when it is time for the cone to do its thing.

    I doubt my springs would strech enough to run them retained
    Maybe you should look at something like the Xspring to help relocate your springs.And everything will just come back to the old argument re.To retain or not to retain springs,and that is something that has been covered many time previously.

    Wayne

Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!