Not ever having had one apart, I would have to make an educated guess, that's the main shaft that sticks out the back, so a replacement shaft may be a massive outlay...
Just a couple of questions:It would have to be a better solution over adapter shafts.
- Has anyone ever made a replacement output shaft for the MSA box that interfaces directly with the LT230?
- Is it possible?
You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.
Not ever having had one apart, I would have to make an educated guess, that's the main shaft that sticks out the back, so a replacement shaft may be a massive outlay...
Back in the day when people in the LROC Sydney were converting series land rovers, we had a member/machinist make replacement shafts for C4 Ford autos to series TF and New Process 4 speed manual boxes to series transfers. The biggest problem was to get the machined shaft hardened without bending. (They needed to be hung vertically not laid horizontal)
The issues would be the OD sizes of the splines, shoulders and bearings which must step down rather that up and down to be able to load the gears from the respective ends.
You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.
1/ I don't know of any one
2/ Its certainly possible But why? .There are 6 different bearing surfaces 4 different splines as well as a thread to control end float shaft run out is max.008" standard .002 which is easy till the heat treater gets his hot little hands on itThe mainshaft as it is will handle anything a ****y little 4b will put it thru till you put a crappy 10 spline for the TC gear on the end of it
Noel
Why would it be out of line I had .002" TIR when all bolted up the shaft is a firm fit to the flange .It could be Loctited but this would defeat being able to replace the shaft in 15 minutes if needed .I tried to post a pic of a Ford Toploader to series mainshaft we used to make but Manage Attachments panel has altered and says my JPG files are a invalid attachment
Noel
Isn't the alignment controlled by the accuracy of the adapter housing?
I don't see how a one piece mainshaft is going to help with that.
My thought is that a splined adapter shaft (like AncientMariner has done) is a more accommodating of any slight misalignment than a stub shaft like TheGrubb's.
Regarding spline lubrication - if its a real issue how about running the adapter wet?
Steve
1985 County - Isuzu 4bd1 with HX30W turbo, LT95, 255/85-16 KM2's
1988 120 with rust and potential
1999 300tdi 130 single cab - "stock as bro"
2003 D2a Td5 - the boss's daily drive
Hi Lotza. Although not answering your question it may help to know that Outcast got their shafts made my an axle manufacturer (obvious I guess), such that shafts bolt to the existing MSA5 drive flanges, with 10 spline into to LT230 input gears.
Do I recall somewhere someone talking about EDMing/weld adapting the LT230 input gear to a different spline count and making a better spud shaft to match? From memory, some parts of the input gear do not have much thickness to play around with.
There are a number points of misalignment. The adapter housing can be out of line in 3 different planes, but there are also alignment issues with an adapter shaft. Looking at the Outcast adapter the notch would have to add an element of balance and there are multiple points where vibration could be induced if out of line.
What I'm also suggesting is that on the C4 and NV3400 boxes where the mainshafts were welded, or sleeved and finally replacement shafts were made. The only ones that were reliable were the replacement mainshafts
You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks