Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 78

Thread: Td5 vs tdci

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by PAT303 View Post
    The Td5 and Tdi can be tweaked but so can the TDCi,to levels way above anything the the other two can reach.
    Only what I've been told, but talking to a customer of Bruce Davis and on another occasion a couple of his mechanics and they all said that Bruce and his boys reckon the TD5 probably has more potential and will take more abuse (in terms of able to handle power and torque and stay together) compared to the Tdci.
    It was a very impressive design, quite ahead of it's time compared to most all other manufacturers light diesels.
    That chat with Bruce's mechanics was from about three years ago so they might think differently now, but they were pushing crazy numbers out of a TD5 test mule on the dyno just to see what it'd take.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Orange, NSW
    Posts
    7,965
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Have heard similar from tuners
    But I openly admit I'm biased toward the td5 and nearly every post I'll make in this thread is firmly tongue in cheek

    Sent from my HTC One using AULRO mobile app
    The Phantom - Oslo Blue 2001 Td5 SE.
    Half dead but will live again!

    Nina - Chawton White 2003 Td5 S
    Slowly being improved

    Quote Originally Posted by Judo View Post
    You worry me sometimes Muppet!!


  3. #33
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    971
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rick130 View Post
    Only what I've been told, but talking to a customer of Bruce Davis and on another occasion a couple of his mechanics and they all said that Bruce and his boys reckon the TD5 probably has more potential and will take more abuse (in terms of able to handle power and torque and stay together) compared to the Tdci.
    It was a very impressive design, quite ahead of it's time compared to most all other manufacturers light diesels.
    That chat with Bruce's mechanics was from about three years ago so they might think differently now, but they were pushing crazy numbers out of a TD5 test mule on the dyno just to see what it'd take.
    I would put that down to the level of electronics. The td5 is in my opinion an easier engine to tune.
    The tdci is already pretty well setup from factory, there is many different tune levels depending on the vehicle it ends up in.
    The bowler defenders are making around 170 to 200 hp and 500 to 550nm without any issues at all.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Adelaide Hills
    Posts
    34
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rangieman View Post
    Yes there are some issues with the puma as i have had some time under the bonnet with a forum member to help . The most silly ones are the coolant & turbo hose layout with built in rubbing points which is just dumb in a 4wd. Even your upgraded turbo hoses still rub holes and leave you stranded .
    Just in regards to the rubbing points we all face in the Pumas, I came across this self bonding silicone tape...I keep a couple of rolls handy just on the off chance when I'm out bush
    Hopefully it will do the job to get me back to civilisation!

    Rescue Tape - Fix It All with Silicone Rescue Tape

    And just on point, all Defenders are awesome...as long as there is a wave!!

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,801
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Wicks89 View Post
    I think the td5 and tdci comparison is a little apples and oranges really. I mean, 1999 vs 2007 you know?
    If the tdci wasnt any better than the td5 at anything, they never would have changed it. So thats that, a tdci will blow off my td5. But so it should.
    Actually, the changes are often down to new legislation on new car requirements (emissions, pedestrian safety etc). And then there's the owner change overs. Ford stuck their lump in there because it was on their shelves. The td5 was a landrover engine built for purpose as was the TDI.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Illawarra
    Posts
    2,508
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Puma v Td5
    Plus and minus points,
    Far better interior, heated seats heated screen, aircon, and rear seats. TD5, more seats, front vents, easier to replace screen..
    Exterior puma, prettier paint on limited editions , more metal skin, rest same. Td5 last defender you can put tyre on bonnet.
    Suspension/drivetrain, puma sway bars, angles make lift more of a PIA, early feel breather position. Td5 easier to modify/lift, until end 2002 Salisbury diff which is stronger, no sway bars.
    Engines, stock puma better, modified??????

    Personally own a Td5 nine seat, but would happily have a puma AS WELL.
    If a local could cost 3.2td5 conversion to older defenders we could have the best of both worlds.
    ,

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Free Again Thanks Dan
    Posts
    10,150
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Black 110 View Post
    Just in regards to the rubbing points we all face in the Pumas, I came across this self bonding silicone tape...I keep a couple of rolls handy just on the off chance when I'm out bush
    Hopefully it will do the job to get me back to civilisation!

    Rescue Tape - Fix It All with Silicone Rescue Tape

    And just on point, all Defenders are awesome...as long as there is a wave!!
    Yes great stuff i carry some just in case i travel with someone driving a puma
    But it still is not a good engineering design with the tdci . Maybe every tdci should come with some rescue tape in the glovebox standard oh thats right puma`s dont have a glovebox

  8. #38
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Safety Bay
    Posts
    8,041
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rick130 View Post
    Only what I've been told, but talking to a customer of Bruce Davis and on another occasion a couple of his mechanics and they all said that Bruce and his boys reckon the TD5 probably has more potential and will take more abuse (in terms of able to handle power and torque and stay together) compared to the Tdci.
    It was a very impressive design, quite ahead of it's time compared to most all other manufacturers light diesels.
    That chat with Bruce's mechanics was from about three years ago so they might think differently now, but they were pushing crazy numbers out of a TD5 test mule on the dyno just to see what it'd take.
    No offence to Bruce but he changed my timing belt and left the top rad hose clamp off almost destroying my engine no more than a dozen k's down the road,and he refused to do anything about it . Pat

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I've only ever spoken to him on the phone Pat, many, many years ago.

    I actually ran into two of his mechanics at a movie shoot !
    They were supplying and looking after the period vehicles and were checking out the 130 in the car park at the wardrobe fitting so we got talking.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Warner Area - SEQ
    Posts
    1,924
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Question

    Quote Originally Posted by Slunnie View Post
    If they weren't going to use a Land Rover motor, it's a shame they didn't fit the Ranger motor instead of the Transit motor. I've no doubt it would have been a much better option. I would assume that since the Td5 fits into the engine bay the Ranger motor would fit also. Actually, they could have also fit the Ranger auto which would have been a great option to have.

    Curious here, but I've spoken to a few fellas at work who own the 3.2 Rangers & they inform me that when it comes to an oil change, that u can't leave it sit there and drain the oil for an half hour or whatever, but u simply remove the majority of the oil, refit sump plug and refill.... They said there is a potential issue with the oil pump losing it's prime and causing damage to the engine......

    My question is - Does this apply to the Ford 2.4 &/or 2.2 engines?

Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!