Have heard similar from tuners![]()
But I openly admit I'm biased toward the td5 and nearly every post I'll make in this thread is firmly tongue in cheek![]()
Sent from my HTC One using AULRO mobile app
Only what I've been told, but talking to a customer of Bruce Davis and on another occasion a couple of his mechanics and they all said that Bruce and his boys reckon the TD5 probably has more potential and will take more abuse (in terms of able to handle power and torque and stay together) compared to the Tdci.
It was a very impressive design, quite ahead of it's time compared to most all other manufacturers light diesels.
That chat with Bruce's mechanics was from about three years ago so they might think differently now, but they were pushing crazy numbers out of a TD5 test mule on the dyno just to see what it'd take.
Have heard similar from tuners![]()
But I openly admit I'm biased toward the td5 and nearly every post I'll make in this thread is firmly tongue in cheek![]()
Sent from my HTC One using AULRO mobile app
I would put that down to the level of electronics. The td5 is in my opinion an easier engine to tune.
The tdci is already pretty well setup from factory, there is many different tune levels depending on the vehicle it ends up in.
The bowler defenders are making around 170 to 200 hp and 500 to 550nm without any issues at all.
Just in regards to the rubbing points we all face in the Pumas, I came across this self bonding silicone tape...I keep a couple of rolls handy just on the off chance when I'm out bush
Hopefully it will do the job to get me back to civilisation!
Rescue Tape - Fix It All with Silicone Rescue Tape
And just on point, all Defenders are awesome...as long as there is a wave!!
Actually, the changes are often down to new legislation on new car requirements (emissions, pedestrian safety etc). And then there's the owner change overs. Ford stuck their lump in there because it was on their shelves. The td5 was a landrover engine built for purpose as was the TDI.
Puma v Td5
Plus and minus points,
Far better interior, heated seats heated screen, aircon, and rear seats. TD5, more seats, front vents, easier to replace screen..
Exterior puma, prettier paint on limited editions, more metal skin, rest same. Td5 last defender you can put tyre on bonnet.
Suspension/drivetrain, puma sway bars, angles make lift more of a PIA, early feel breather position. Td5 easier to modify/lift, until end 2002 Salisbury diff which is stronger, no sway bars.
Engines, stock puma better, modified??????
Personally own a Td5 nine seat, but would happily have a puma AS WELL.
If a local could cost 3.2td5 conversion to older defenders we could have the best of both worlds.
,
I've only ever spoken to him on the phone Pat, many, many years ago.
I actually ran into two of his mechanics at a movie shoot !
They were supplying and looking after the period vehicles and were checking out the 130 in the car park at the wardrobe fitting so we got talking.
Curious here, but I've spoken to a few fellas at work who own the 3.2 Rangers & they inform me that when it comes to an oil change, that u can't leave it sit there and drain the oil for an half hour or whatever, but u simply remove the majority of the oil, refit sump plug and refill.... They said there is a potential issue with the oil pump losing it's prime and causing damage to the engine......
My question is - Does this apply to the Ford 2.4 &/or 2.2 engines?
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks