Thread: Disco D2 TD5 Diesel Fuel economy

Thanks Naviguesser.

Hope you enjoyed your time away.

Also the great comprihensive post.

I'm grateful you have taken the time to share your figures with us.

Sorry to hear about the I-PAD.

I am unable to get my vehicle to do near your figures.

But I too love my TD5.

Cheers

My D2a did the following.
Around town,11 to 12l/100
On a run at 100k's,9.5 to 10.5l/100
On a run at around 90k's,stuck behind traffic,etc,9 to 10l/100
All the above lightly loaded,two people,nothing on roof.

Heavily loaded,say a 4 week camping trip,nothing on roof,it didn't seem to use a lot more,maybe around .5l/100 more,at the most.

I once got 8.6l/100 on a long run stuck behind grey nomads pulling caravans.Average speed would have been around 80 to 85k's.In these type of conditions,i always try to keep in 4th locked up.
It seemed to use a lot of fuel going slow,with lots of stop start type of stuff on the farm,often around 15l/100 or more.

Generally i recon the D2 is pretty good on fuel.The D4 i have now is worse,generally
around 1 to 2 l/100 worse,at least,in the same conditions.A bit of a PITA,as it has a smaller tank than the D2.

The 3's and 4's do weigh a bit more--

Originally Posted by NWTASD2

Thanks Naviguesser.
......
I am unable to get my vehicle to do near your figures.
......
Cheers

I wouldn't have thought NW Tasmania would be the most economical part of Australia to drive around.
Then again I've never been to that part of Tassie.
Hope to get there soon.

Originally Posted by Pedro_The_Swift

The 3's and 4's do weigh a bit more--

True,but i still recon if the D2 is loaded to the same weight as an empty D4,the D2 would use less fuel.

Same as 300TDi D1,would use less fuel than the TD5 D2,if loaded to same weight.

So the trend seems to be they are getting more powerful,comfortable,etc,but also use more fuel.Even though engine technology has improved.But then again emission rules are getting tougher.

The 3l D4 may use slightly less in real use than the 2.7l,but i don't know.

The new 8 speed auto,and also if the newer models shed some weight,fuel usage should hopefully drop.

The early road tests indicated the Td5 had better consumption figures than the Tdi. A test of the Td5 auto published in October 1998 by Autocar found the Td5 did 3mpg better overall and 6mpg better on the test touring route.

For the record the Autorcar figures were:
Worst: 17.9mpg - 15.8L/100km
Best: 31.4mpg - 9L/100km
Touring: 31.4mpg - 9L/100km
Average: 26.6mpg - 10.6L/100km

Originally Posted by Pinelli

Notice the fuel consupmtion going up on the auto TD5.
Was getting around 13L/100km.
Changed the MAF.
Today it was <11.5L/100km

Should pay for itself in about 4 months.

Hmm, have noticed fuel consumption going up again recently, and having ruled out leaks and other issues, have decided it may well be the MAF. Was trying to remember when I last changed the MAF, and Mr Google found my post above.

Just over 2 years, is that as long as they last??????

Originally Posted by Dutchy65

bugger - my 2001 TD5 gets about 8.5 l/100km...and has done for the last 10 years ! and p.s. it has no mods - all stock standard ! Ditch the mods - ditch the wanna-be mechanic advice and stick with a real mechanic that knows the car.

Mate how do you work out the consumption? There is a certain way to get an accurate measure which I have caught a few posted info are wrongly calculated. Is a very surprise for me that you get 8.5l/100km, most new 4x4 truck with better technology achieved that result in recent years.