
Originally Posted by
cripesamighty
The argument stems from how much of recent change is human generated - anthropogenic - and that depends on constantly changing scientific output - for good or ill.
in regards to sea levels, i dont think it matters. the level is going to change regardless. what were we going to do if it wasnt human generated? stand our ground as the sea washes in? tell the ocean that climate change is wrong and it needs to go back? sue captain planet for loss of property value?

Originally Posted by
cripesamighty
For instance, when I did Atmospheric Physics and Climatology at uni many years ago as part of my degree, the so called 'hockey stick' model didn't exist in its current format. The graph it is based on still contained around 650 years worth of data centred around the middle ages, which included a mini ice age and global warming period, missing from many of todays graphs....
your not saying the data has been massaged are you? or data has been ignored to use an agenda? cause that never happens.
Current Cars:
2013 E3 Maloo, 350kw
2008 RRS, TDV8
1995 VS Clubsport
Previous Cars:
2008 ML63, V8
2002 VY SS Ute, 300kw
2002 Disco 2, LS1 conversion
Bookmarks