I originally missed this one:
This site is a prime example of damaging it's own reputation, rendering it useless.
When the group posts such 'information' (as the above), as a minimum they need to reveal the source of the information ... ie. who/where it was published.In the year 2000, NASA did publish information on its Earth Observatory website about the Milankovitch Climate Theory, revealing that the planet is, in fact, changing due to extraneous factors that have absolutely nothing to do with human activity.
A link to the article, or a pdf of it, or anything at all.
Without this kind of evidence to back up their claim .. it's just heresay .. "he said, she said" .. and the debate goes no where, and climate deniers credibility goes out the window.
Those kinds of sources of info are best avoided.
A better source of information for the debunking or denialist movement comes directly from the 'climate change scientific' community themselves.




Reply With Quote

Bookmarks