
Originally Posted by
Arapiles
.... On the other hand, the changes to our climate are behaving as predicted in the models - but you don't accept the evidence of that either ...
Ah! .. so, rash generalization is now considered a prediction!
When the prediction is for a 1° change in 30 years time, and that change ends up more like 0.3-0.4° .. this isn't taken into account? .. just the fact that the temperature went up.
The magnetic field issue is exactly the same issue. They knew it was moving, and it was expected to move. The amounts it moved weren't 'as expected'.
So your expectation of what a scientist is doesn't involve any form of accuracy on their part for their predictions then?
May as well just call the astrologers to come do it.
So it's going to be very interesting to read their scientific explanations when the worlds average temps drop over the next 30 years
Arthur.
All these discos are giving me a heart attack!
'99 D1 300Tdi Auto ( now sold :( )
'03 D2 Td5 Auto
'03 D2a Td5 Auto
Bookmarks