Grumpy old buggers thread

[350RRC]

Scientists aren't that silly, as not only do they model into the future, they also check how the model matches up to the past.

There's a type of fisheries model that I'm very familiar with, for a couple very different species in the ocean down here.

When there were 'issues' I used to get them to be run backwards and they never came close to reproducing the actual data that was inputted in the first place.

DL

[NavyDiver]

There's a type of fisheries model that I'm very familiar with, for a couple very different species in the ocean down here.

When there were 'issues' I used to get them to be run backwards and they never came close to reproducing the actual data that was inputted in the first place.

DL

Science is always evolving happily

[Saitch]

Science is always evolving happily

Scientists are human, therefore, could it be said that the human race is evolving equal to, or faster than, science, albeit happily?

[RHS58]

If it was an English wine, it still would have been horrible.

English whine is not uncommon.

[350RRC]

Science is always evolving happily

Devolution in this case.............. none of the erroneous assumptions in this model have been addressed in any meaningful way in 15 years.

It has become more important to try to fit the data to the model, rather than the other way round.

[Tins]

- Which suggests the stories of Roman Vineyards in middle of England maybe not so silly.

Nor the Danes cultivating crops like wheat in Greenland 1000 years ago ( give or take ).

[Tins]

If it was an English wine, it still would have been horrible.

With a nose to equal that of Benedict Cumberbatch, a palate redolent with undertones of fried haddock, a body resembling that of Jeremy Clarkson, followed by a finish only Arthur Daley could admire.

I'll 'ave Terry bring the van around.

[Tins]

Devolution in this case.............. none of the erroneous assumptions in this model have been addressed in any meaningful way in 15 years.

It has become more important to try to fit the data to the model, rather than the other way round.

Hiding the decline is still a fave.

[4bee]

Good point, but 'Climate Change', 'Global Warming' or whatever, some things never change. If it was an English wine, it still would have been horrible.

Not necessarily. Some wine,even UK ones could improve with age. Practically on the same Latitude with the soil structure & type as La Belle France so why not, it was joined to France before the "Channel Megaflood" burst way back 450,000 years ago.

The English Channel Megaflood And How Britain Became An Island

[350RRC]

Hiding the decline is still a fave.

It's actually the opposite.