
Originally Posted by
SPROVER
So why they couldnt just surround him is beyond me.I think they panicked more then anything.And it will all come out exactly what happened sooner or later.This thread has certainly been controversial and i think a few people on here need to calm down a bit.Theres no need for people to have a go at someone else because they have a different opinion.But i will still be watching this with interest.No doubt it will be in the media for some time to come.
Just bear in mind some on here have real world experience of firearms and know that some of the things others have suggested are simply not practical.
Others probably have operational experience as well, and know just how little time you really have in these situations when everything is turning to **** and you need to make life or death decisions in a split second, so take exception to the armchair experts sitting back and saying what should have been done from the comfort of their PC!
Take your suggestion to surround him for instance - if he then advances on one officer, who then has a safe shot with the others potentially in the line of fire?
Two shots per officer isn't overkill either - there are plenty of stories of people taking far more rounds and still advancing, and I've seen animals hit with far bigger rounds than from a service pistol run 50m easily when the shot was a fatal one.....and that's without the potential benefit of alcohol or drugs!
Jeff
1994 300TDi Defender
2010 TDV8 RRS
Bookmarks