ooops double post
Rereading post #1, the operational criteria was:
day trip around Lithgow
BASH the track or bush into submission.
Im happy to cede based on that criteria
I Would like to think Defender drivers are in harmony with their surrounds, have the window down , tanned forearm, and leave only tracks, not mud holes, chardonnay bottles, or nappies. as markers
And maybe drive more than 1 day from the nearest barista.
By all means get a Defender. If you get a good one, you'll be happy. If you get a bad one, you'll become a philosopher.
apologies to Socrates
Clancy MY15 110 Defender
Clancy's gone to Queensland Rovering, and we don't know where he are
ooops double post
Puma's have been made from, was it 2006???? and have had various engine and other upgrades since then but it is still the same generation vehicle once they went away from TD5's and having external vents under the windscreen and having a bonnet hump etc.
Exactly the same thing is correct with the D3 and the D4, they are the same generation vehicle as well with several upgrades, so not sure why you keep bringing this up?
When it comes to you not liking the criteria set out in the op about allowing both vehicles to compete off road on the same size and spec tyres I thought it much fairer and more logical to put both on the same spec as a Defender rather than putting a Defender on Disco's 30" highway spec tyres.
As I originally said any comparison should be about each vehicles off road capabilities not who has the biggest tyre advantage.
But if you would rather compare the two vehicles off road on 30" highway tyres then trust me I'm fine with that. ...![]()
Cheers,
Terry
D1 V8 (Gone)D2a HSE V8 (Gone)D3 HSE TDV6 (Unfortunately Gone)D4 V8
You know the puma has the advantage becuase of its bigger tyre size.....thats becuase it was designed for a purpose. You engineered this thread to have the same size tyres to take away the pumas advantage.
You've actually given me a great idea;
How about a thread along the lines off:
"Pumas are currently in high demand and people are paying high prices for them. Considering a d4 is only 10k more on average over a newish puma is it worth paying the extra?
Is the d4 better off road compared to a puma......if you take out the d4s automatic trickery is it actually any good off road?"
You see if i take something away that clearly gives a vehicle a huge advantage then it isnt a fair comparison!
If you still reckon it is then how about this;
You bring your disco on what ever size tyres you want and ill bring my puma on 33s and rear locked and you can use all the "automatic" crap you want and see who gets through what tracks. Dont worry ill bring a snatch strap for you![]()
Puma 2007
D3 2004
By allowing the older disco gen to compare to only the newest defender incarnation you are steering away from the d4 19" rim limitation, allowing the d3 to cover where the d4 fails (wheel size limits) and at the same time not allowing the previous defender gen (td5) to cover where the puma fails (weaker diffs supposedly).
Latest d4 vs Puma off the showroom floor is the logical comparison that would simplify the whole debate. But you couldn't present it like that because you would lose.
If you allow aftermarket modifications on both vehicles, again you loose.
Looks like you can't win.
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks