Page 190 of 451 FirstFirst ... 90140180188189190191192200240290 ... LastLast
Results 1,891 to 1,900 of 4508

Thread: Won’t be retro...

  1. #1891
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    3,394
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Zeros View Post
    Unfortunately that is part of the problem for JLR. Not only are they attempting to launch a new ‘icon’ (impossible), but they must also counteract their own previous trivialisation if the icon - the DC100.

    IMO...if JLR are confident in the new Defender, they should have said nothing about it until it was actually ready to be unveiled. Then it would potentially have had wow factor.

    Instead they just invite either ongoing pointless speculation, or criticism. This may have continued anyway, but fuelling the fire could really backfire if the new Defender takes ANY cues from the DC100.
    Maybe pointless in for you, for others not so much, they are genuinely excited and want to see the latest info. Make sure you close your eyes next next time s spy vid is put up or a JLR on record comment is put up Won’t be retro...

    ANY styling cues from DC100 could make defender really backfire? Reasonably speaking as already mentioned by myself and others there are quite a few things to like about the DC100 concept, others not so much. So in many ways following some of the design cues could actually help the new Defender.Won’t be retro...

  2. #1892
    DiscoMick Guest
    I hope there is enough length behind the rear wheels to give a decent amount of luggage space.
    I was looking at a Jeep Wrangler five door yesterday and how much shorter it is than my Defender 110.
    One of the mistakes LR made with the D1 was it was too short in the back and they had to lengthen it for the D2.
    Looking at the spy shots of the new Defender it looks fairly short behind the rear wheels. I hope this is just caused by the camo.

  3. #1893
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    3,394
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by DiscoMick View Post
    I hope there is enough length behind the rear wheels to give a decent amount of luggage space.
    I was looking at a Jeep Wrangler five door yesterday and how much shorter it is than my Defender 110.
    One of the mistakes LR made with the D1 was it was too short in the back and they had to lengthen it for the D2.
    Looking at the spy shots of the new Defender it looks fairly short behind the rear wheels. I hope this is just caused by the camo.
    For sure, I think it depends where the rear seats are, there is certainly a lot of room in the rear seat area with the apparent rear door it would seem too much like an LSE.
    Many people with an LSE Range Rover classic say that it would be perfect if the rear seats were moved forward 4 inches, allowing more storage space in the back and 4 inches more legroom in the front.

    With the Range Rover classic short wheel base you received amazing ramp over angle but the compromise was that there is not much legroom compared to say a patrol or a cruiser.

    It's a delicate balance if you want to have incredible off-road credentials, which it has according to alloy and grit.

    It looks like, by the height of the roof, and the large side opening rear door combined with boxy look, it would have more rear luggage space than a Range Rover classic imo, but maybe not as much as the last Defender unless the rear seat is further forward then it seems.

    I went and checked out the Suzuki Jimny for storage space and came away thinking it would be very difficult to tour in from a storage point of view for any more than 1 maybe 2 people, even then it would be very tough. To me it seems like more of a weekend play thing, and a very good one at that.

    I think by the looks of it they have again met in the middle with providing just enough space to still allow a great ramp over and departure angle.

    With the air suspension they are able to run a higher height off road than the Range Rover classic that also allows them to move more of the luggage towards the centre of the vehicle so basically running a long wheel base without compromising ramp over.

    Assuming in the picture attached that the front seats are in the rear most position, we could assume the rear seats are in the position shown. Then storage would be sufficient. (Approx only took 10seconds)

    The more I think about it the more the job of redesigning the new Land Rover Defender was an epic job and one that would have amounted to a huge amount of sleepless nights from a huge amount of people. So far from what we've seen they have done an incredible job, however it is still earlish days.

    I think the biggest shock for some will be going from a flat panelled square box to a slightly more rounded boxy shape. Some people for some reason link rounded body shapes with bad off road capability. In reality the main reason rounded body shapes are used is for fuel economy, case in point the new 2017 onwards Disco, this body was designed amongst other things for low drag, fuel economy and low emissions. They achieved this amazingly well and at the same time improved it's off road capability from the previous model.

    I see the same happening with the new Defender and I don't have a problem with that at all. Won’t be retro...

  4. #1894
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    3,394
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Found another shot of a higher profile tyred pilot snow testing, anyone work out what profile this would be?

  5. #1895
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Rover
    Posts
    1,936
    Total Downloaded
    0
    If the new Defender is going to be so similar to the Discovery why build it at all?

  6. #1896
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    3,394
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Zeros View Post
    If the new Defender is going to be so similar to the Discovery why build it at all?
    Who said it was?

  7. #1897
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    3,394
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Wow, this guy got a scoop!

    YouTube

    New Hybrid Defender testing in Moab.

    I think we can all but confirm the second fuel flap is for the electric plug.

    Also steering wheel looking similar but not identical to leaked pics, remember JLR confirmed leaked pics are older pre-production photos. Looks like wheel has white plastic camo on it plus black wrap around buttons.

    Looks like they are trying the performance version in MOAB as 1 has twin Exhausts & 20s on it and big brakes like ring pilot. However still has a 60 profile and looks like there is plenty of space for bigger tyres again as noted in vid. Like 275/65R20 (34s)

    255/60R20 MS shown in vid.

    Stock 32's either way, so that's great news for people that still want the performance version, it looks like off-road performance won't be compromised.

    Jeff in vid doesn't at the time realize due to the camo the second time he see's the mules/pilots they are completely different vehicles, that's why the second 110 doesn't have rear spare.

    He later corrects this and says that the first vehicle is a short wheel base and most likely a 2 litre turbo diesel and mentioned to me that he could hear the diesel ticking, the long wheelbase is a hybrid.

    4 LR vehicles in vid.

    1st two: SWB RRS Defender 2020 Mule (maybe coil SWB mule as seen testing on roads) & SWB Defender 2020 (non hybrid)

    2nd two: maybe 2020 RRS pilot of some kind and hybrid 110 defender 2020

    Bulging fenders, lots of clearance above the 32s.

    Rear window down for first time, however part of it seems covered

    Rear solid recovery point seen for the first time. Was soft version at the Ring.

    Rear huge airbag(according to Jeff) and can be seen in vid.

    Stance in an off-road setting with the 32s looks very good!

    Edit: I removed screenshots just incase due to copyright

    Edit Edit: Asked for permission to use vid and screenshots for the LR community here and approved, Jeff was very kind in doing so and asked if you like vid please subscribe. YouTube





    Last edited by blackrangie; 10th April 2019 at 07:25 AM. Reason: Gained permission to use and discuss video here, pics added.

  8. #1898
    DiscoMick Guest
    I still think it looks too short behind the rear wheels to match the rear storage space of a 110.

  9. #1899
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    3,394
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by DiscoMick View Post
    I still think it looks too short behind the rear wheels to match the rear storage space of a 110.
    100% I don't think it will match old defender length wise for rear luggage space, I wonder if it will have the full length side box sections or not, or will some of that space be storage in new one like RRC or where 6th and 7th seat are in D2, its for sure got the height.

  10. #1900
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Brisbane West
    Posts
    7,372
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by ozscott View Post
    Here is the difference between Vern's stock (as I understand it) Patrol (current model) tyres and LR typical stock tyres- ie both for 18 inch rims. The difference in sidewall height is very appreciable. As to going up...yes you can legally take the 255/60 to 255/65 but you are still a fair way down on sidewall height and length of track when aired down and of course the Patrol can go up a profile side and a with size too...

    Cheers

    255/60/20 is the same 6inch sidewall that I quoted above for the D3 stock 18inch tyre. Legal max increase is 265/65/20 which is 6.78.

    The one good thing of having a 20 inch at the same tyre specs of an 18inch is better tyre approach angle especially valuable on sand.

    Cheers
    Cheers

Page 190 of 451 FirstFirst ... 90140180188189190191192200240290 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!