Talking about something isn't nessesarily judging is it?
Final Judgment is saying i think its rubbish and wont get 1 or its perfect and i will get 1.
I think the article was very fairly written, that we can't judge the new Defender off rumours and mules that are designed to deceive either way.
Sitting on the fence is undecided judgement, wasnt that his point?
Good point about the g wagon, i thing different companies have different marketing techniques it seems and JLR certainly is getting a ton of press and creating anticipation it seems, working for me..and JLR could have released the Defender a few years ago if it wasnt for MLA (Mild hybrid/hybrid/fully electric) future proofing and wanting to get the looks right for fans based on concept feedback.
In terms of retro in the American defender video the lady says something like when people look at it they will say, "that's the new Defender, and the wait is worth it you wont be disapointed".. so that's a positive I guess it will just look like a modernized defender but will not be the same shape gwagon style with upgraded interior and driveline..And the JLR is on record as saying it "will leave the gwagon in the shade" and "have driven on and offroad against competitors and its sensatiinal", Them are fightn words and talking a big talk. But for me proof will be in tasting the pudding.


 
					
					 
				
				
				
				
			 
						
					 Originally Posted by Zeros
 Originally Posted by Zeros
					
 , as a CEO making massive claims if you are found to be lying or deliberately misleading investors or the public it has big consequences these days.
, as a CEO making massive claims if you are found to be lying or deliberately misleading investors or the public it has big consequences these days.
				 
			
Bookmarks