I would take that pic with a grain of salt, both for the tyre and the vehicle.
The tyre size seems to read 275/85/R18 that would give you a side wall of 9" and a 34" tyre and there is no way that is what that tyre is. On top of that you have the load index and speed rating of 95W which gives you 690Kg and 270Kph - I highly doubt a tyre with that tread is going to hit those speeds not to mention the under spec weight index.
It's all photoshop. LR are not going to go to the trouble of disguising all the test vehicles only to reveal it in a single marketing pic.
Maybe they are clever enough to know the world is going to look at that sort of thing and are throwing out hints on what might be possible, who knows? Could be the exact opposite too.
EDIT: maybe it's a 35 profile tyre which would make it about a 25" tyre.... all the numbers on the tyre would make sense then including making the profile look right, just the issue of the photoshopped tread and being made to fit the wheel arches. yep, all bogus.

Originally Posted by
blackrangie
Someone on a different forum pointed out if you zoom in on the media version of Land Rover pictures available on the media website the rear wheel size and tyre size is visible.
Is this the first official confirmation of factory fitted 18s?
The MOAB Defenders we're running on 20s with 32 inch tyres.
So 18's with 32s will live an increase in sidewall from what we saw at moab.
Also this BFG tire size is quite strange anyone know what it is?


Cheers,
Sean
“Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.” - Albert Einstein
Bookmarks