Thread: whats a better safer and stronger option with shock mods

Originally Posted by dobbo

I have been watching this thread with interest. I have taken my car on some fairly tough terrain since owning it. It still sits on the original springs and shocks. Whilst I would love for my car to sit as high in the sky as both Slunnies and Redbacks I simple cannot justify the amount of work involved in the 4 inch lift. If you have a mild 30 mm lift (like that on CAL415's) you can still retain the superb drivability of the vehicle and have the extra clearance. This is just my opinion.

True, for most 2" is perfect, but I guess it really depends on what you're chasing. 2" is easy and probably very good value especially for tourers, but when you want to go that little bit further with the suspension so you can go that little bit further etc, it all starts to cost and the value for money starts to drop. To get to where I am has been expensive, but that's just what I do for fun. I think my next project (After the IIa ute) may be hotting up a tractor .

I agree Mick, the 2" lift will go a long long way!

Originally Posted by Slunnie

True, for most 2" is perfect, but I guess it really depends on what you're chasing. 2" is easy and probably very good value especially for tourers, but when you want to go that little bit further with the suspension so you can go that little bit further etc, it all starts to cost and the value for money starts to drop. To get to where I am has been expensive, but that's just what I do for fun. I think my next project (After the IIa ute) may be hotting up a tractor .

Your one sick B45tard Slunnie, may I suggest a big Mopar in an old Fergie.

Absolutely! I'd been thinking Chev into a grey Fergie and wheelie bars off the 3 point linkage.

0-15km/h in 0.2sec. I guess that would either be forwards or downwards depending on the surface.

Anyway back to the original question. I'm not saying don't do it, all I'm saying is it's not necessary on a D2, in standard trim the later D2's (2002 on) can fit 265/75/R16 on standard suspension setup. This lifts the car approx one inch over standard height, combine this with a mild lift should give enough clearance. On the articulation side of it if you have ACE fitted on your car your set to take on the world. With this setup you still have enough pennies left to buy lockers and such.

spoke to paul he advised that B46-1361 are selling now at $853 a pair 10 inch travel not prob the GU front will cost about $660 a pair then the mods

Im going down tommorrow to visit and come up with what I need perhaps I didnt understand the cost but that huge

Originally Posted by Slunnie

Absolutely! I'd been thinking Chev into a grey Fergie and wheelie bars off the 3 point linkage.

0-15km/h in 0.2sec. I guess that would either be forwards or downwards depending on the surface.

tap in 'sand drags' on youtube... I think you're a natural

Originally Posted by dobbo

Anyway back to the original question. I'm not saying don't do it, all I'm saying is it's not necessary on a D2, in standard trim the later D2's (2002 on) can fit 265/75/R16 on standard suspension setup. This lifts the car approx one inch over standard height, combine this with a mild lift should give enough clearance. On the articulation side of it if you have ACE fitted on your car your set to take on the world. With this setup you still have enough pennies left to buy lockers and such.

I have 265x75x16 now on the D2, cooper STT which scrab on the mud gard at turn but thats another story hehehehehehe


the reason why I chose to do a 4 inch is well because I can hehehehe no because the 4 inch lift wasnt enough on the pootrol and figured it would be perfect for the disco due to wheel distance from front to rear being better on the disco as for lockers and that there comming to dont worry about that hehehehehehe but I enjoy that hard terian not intrested in rock hopping but I like the hard terrian