Page 6 of 9 FirstFirst ... 45678 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 82

Thread: 3.2 Up and running!!!

  1. #51
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    352
    Total Downloaded
    0

    What about Compliance?

    What is the swap over process inc timelines starting from commit to completion, compliance to drive away etc

    Many Thanks,
    pd

  2. #52
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Sunshine Coast
    Posts
    790
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by grinna1965 View Post
    ...our 3.2 at the moment is 192hp & 500nm at the wheels.
    I would be keen to see that dyno readout, any chance you could post it up?

  3. #53
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    The Hills.
    Posts
    19,161
    Total Downloaded
    152.79 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by uninformed View Post
    The 3.2 is a great engine (so far for me) but imo definitely needs a lt230 behind it. I think any LR owner will love it as long as the install is sorted and trouble free
    My understanding was, and Glenn can obviously correct me, that you would keep the LT230 if you stuck with the 6 speed manual. If you want the Ranger auto, then it changes.
    ​JayTee

    Nullus Anxietus

    Cancer is gender blind.

    2000 D2 TD5 Auto: Tins
    1994 D1 300TDi Manual: Dave
    1980 SIII Petrol Tray: Doris
    OKApotamus #74
    Nanocom, D2 TD5 only.

  4. #54
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Ferntree Gully, Vic
    Posts
    1,814
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Hmm... what about a D2 conversion? 3.2 Up and running!!!

  5. #55
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    The Hills.
    Posts
    19,161
    Total Downloaded
    152.79 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by SPROVER View Post
    Hmm... what about a D2 conversion? 3.2 Up and running!!!
    Glenn says he can put 'em in anything. Question is, is a D2 worth the expense?
    ​JayTee

    Nullus Anxietus

    Cancer is gender blind.

    2000 D2 TD5 Auto: Tins
    1994 D1 300TDi Manual: Dave
    1980 SIII Petrol Tray: Doris
    OKApotamus #74
    Nanocom, D2 TD5 only.

  6. #56
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    193
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by johntins View Post
    Glenn says he can put 'em in anything. Question is, is a D2 worth the expense?
    Les Richmond Autos is toying with the idea of building D2's to a pretty wild spec (LS3 6.2litre etc etc etc) for around $125K Les Richmond Automotive - Home | Facebook

  7. #57
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Tolga FNQ
    Posts
    1,002
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Sorry mate;
    Have you a 3.2 installed in a Puma?
    Who did the work?
    Also, sorry, what’s an LT230? An auto box?
    Thanks for any info.
    Ken

    Quote Originally Posted by uninformed View Post
    The 3.2 is a great engine (so far for me) but imo definitely needs a lt230 behind it. I think any LR owner will love it as long as the install is sorted and trouble free

  8. #58
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    5,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    No, I have the 3.2 in my BT50. But in wet weather, IMO, it would be MUCH better with full time 4wd. The LT230 is the FT 4WD transfer case that LR use in the RRC, Disco 1/2 and 110's and defenders. Great Transfer case IMO.

    John, I wasnt saying the 3.2 conversion lost the LT230, just it would have better driveability with it...

  9. #59
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    wauchope
    Posts
    85
    Total Downloaded
    0

    lt230

    Quote Originally Posted by uninformed View Post
    The 3.2 is a great engine (so far for me) but imo definitely needs a lt230 behind it. I think any LR owner will love it as long as the install is sorted and trouble free
    the manual has the lt230 behind it.I just suggested to the other guy if he was in a hurry for an auto we could do it using the ranger auto and transfer case as our lt230 case adaptor is still in the process of being manufactured

  10. #60
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    wauchope
    Posts
    85
    Total Downloaded
    0

    nm

    Quote Originally Posted by uninformed View Post
    Btw 120 nm loss on the dyno seems a lot to me or is this normal?
    very normal mate,people always get dissheartend when the realise how much torque and hp they dont have,most people dont relise that manufactures specs are at the flywheel with no fan or accessories fitted

Page 6 of 9 FirstFirst ... 45678 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!