Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 66

Thread: DIY Map/Maf enhancer / manipulator

  1. #11
    justfishing Guest
    Hello,
    I did buy a MAF enhancer box from Tuning-diesels for affordable tuning modules.
    It works quite well as it amplifies the signal at low rpm, I did rig it on a switch and there is a noticeable difference both in power and smoke when turned on. Also I found it worked much better rigged to the MAP.

    Interesting how does the ECU adjust the boost for the VNT when the MAF reads low volts and is plumbed straight to the outlet pipe and not going through the modulator???
    Ian

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Patagonia
    Posts
    124
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by justfishing View Post
    I did buy a MAF enhancer box from Tuning-diesels for affordable tuning modules.
    Is it the RonBox PD 2 channel module?

  3. #13
    justfishing Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by mturri View Post
    Is it the RonBox PD 2 channel module?
    Hello,
    I brought mine a few years back but looks the same. I am on a mine site so unable to go and have a look. there is only one that fits the TD5 I had trouble with the wiring when first brought it the earth was in the wrong socket on the pins I had to get him to re-wire it as the signal wire and earth were the wrong way around mine is a 2004 Classic TD5. There is a plug for the fuel temp socket which I have not connected as when i do it does a few silly things. Only the MAF plug. I would assume that it gives a lower temp so more fuel is injected or is it the other way around ? Like I said great but much better on the MAP sensor.
    Ian

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Victoria - Pakenham
    Posts
    1,268
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Couldn't you simply put a 4.7V Zener diode across the signal to clamp the voltage? That would cost about 20 cents.

    Obviously the fuel mixture would be incorrect. Lean i'd imagine, lots of air less fuel.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    west of Transylvania
    Posts
    3,782
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I've turned this MAF signal thing all the way around and learned my lesson believe me, got some kicks in the arse in this forum for that which made me read and learn much about the MAF's signal, my final conclusion after lot of study and tests is that it's not healthy to mess with it's signal, nor with the MAP one with boost boxes. If there's not some boost leak, management issue, or fault in the MAF's own electronics there's no reason for it to exceed the 680kg/hr threshold(provided it's not a boost box fitted when the suction can grow due to excessive boost) BUT if somebody insists to run higher boost than 20psi(which can be achieved without boost box) at least leaving the MAF untouched it keeps a kinda backup for turbocharger overspeed protection which otherwise it's managed based on MAP input extracting the AAP from it so when a perfectly working MAF's signal exceeds 680 and the management cuts fuelling the turbo is at a "dangerous" speed already.
    Discovery Td5 (2000), manual, tuned

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne - Eastern sector
    Posts
    963
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I have a std maf on my eu2 td5 with a big vnt and tune to match.. its fantatic!! So I installed the same turbo on my eu3 td5 and am in the process of getting a tune for it. On the eu2 i have no maf issues what so ever. It is a hybrid with a 3 track pedal and app sensor.. on the eu3 i have mojor issues with the maf.. to the point i have to leave unplugged. Low down it drives better with the maf connected but i can't give it more tham half throttle before the maf hits its limit. I would like to clamp the voltage but have not had much success with off the shelf units... like the split second unit although it works well as a boost box

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    west of Transylvania
    Posts
    3,782
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Dis you swap MAF sensors from one car to another just to rule the sensor out?
    Discovery Td5 (2000), manual, tuned

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Orange, NSW
    Posts
    7,965
    Total Downloaded
    0
    IRB developments dual channel anti limit box.....

    Sent from my HTC One using AULRO mobile app
    The Phantom - Oslo Blue 2001 Td5 SE.
    Half dead but will live again!

    Nina - Chawton White 2003 Td5 S
    Slowly being improved

    Quote Originally Posted by Judo View Post
    You worry me sometimes Muppet!!


  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    west of Transylvania
    Posts
    3,782
    Total Downloaded
    0
    So no more turbocharger overspeed protection at all? ... i'm wondering what can happen from mechanical point of view in a turbo overspeed scenario cos i really dont know

    after some search IMO without boost gauge and EGT gauge to keep things on the safe side that could be the end(like in the link with overspeed): https://garrett.honeywell.com/install/troubleshooting/
    Discovery Td5 (2000), manual, tuned

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Victoria - Pakenham
    Posts
    1,268
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by sierrafery View Post
    I've turned this MAF signal thing all the way around and learned my lesson believe me, got some kicks in the arse in this forum for that which made me read and learn much about the MAF's signal, my final conclusion after lot of study and tests is that it's not healthy to mess with it's signal, nor with the MAP one with boost boxes. If there's not some boost leak, management issue, or fault in the MAF's own electronics there's no reason for it to exceed the 680kg/hr threshold(provided it's not a boost box fitted when the suction can grow due to excessive boost) BUT if somebody insists to run higher boost than 20psi(which can be achieved without boost box) at least leaving the MAF untouched it keeps a kinda backup for turbocharger overspeed protection which otherwise it's managed based on MAP input extracting the AAP from it so when a perfectly working MAF's signal exceeds 680 and the management cuts fuelling the turbo is at a "dangerous" speed already.
    I remember the thread you are referring to. It was one of the more thrilling threads on the forum.

    The issue I have is the VDO MAF I've got max's out at 650-60kg/hr according to Nanocom.

    Like others, it is really making me frustrated. Surely with a boost and EGT gauge fitted for observation, it would be better to limit the max voltage rather than fit a 19mm bypass hose for example.

Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!