
Originally Posted by
Tote
The article assumes that “Responding aggressively and eliminating the virus” is an option.
Perhaps it is in those states that are lucky enough through population density, demographics, lifestyle or whatever other factors are at play that has repeatedly allowed them to recover from outbreaks.
It certainly isn’t an option in Sydney where vaccination is the only viable solution, Melbourne is rapidly heading the same way with a three day lockdown extended to three weeks so far
Over 10,000 people are in isolation in the ACT and I’m dubious of their chances of doing much better, although they might just pull it off.
The best aggressive response is to get enough people vaccinated and finally it is starting to happen.
Regards
Tote
I put it to you that where aggressive response has been initiated, with a clear and concise plan, with restrictions explained clearly to the whole population, this gives the best hope for reducing the virus to a level where it may be possible to live with it. The whole population has to buy into the plan, and it seems that this factor may be the reason some areas do better than others . I also believe population density is a large factor in controlling the virus, especially if you have to start with the handicap of waiting too long. As for people in isolation, it wasn't that long ago that we up here had over 12,000 in home quarantine. We now have less than 1,000 , I believe. Not one broke quarantine, and those with a member of the family testing positive, they started the 14 days isolation over again , and again, until no infections were recorded. So I have confidence the ACT will do the same. It can be done, and I believe it will be done.
Last edited by SBD4; 20th August 2021 at 10:39 AM.
Reason: fix quote tag
I’m pretty sure the dinosaurs died out when they stopped gathering food and started having meetings to discuss gathering food
A bookshop is one of the only pieces of evidence we have that people are still thinking
Bookmarks