Page 2 of 11 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 103

Thread: Landrover Vs Toyota!!!.

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    417
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by PAT303 View Post
    Sumo,whats wrong with your 100 series?. Pat

    Pat, its been a pain with top end rattle, they have that bucket & shim set up, Nobody seems to be able to get it right!. Its the 4.7l V8 petrol.


    Sumo

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    5,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    IMO there is a market for the idea of what the defender is and what it COULD be. seperate chassis offers alot of pluses when away from workshops, live axles work very well. Using a Toyo for an example is not so good.....while they do have a good reputaion for certain things the ride isnt one of them......the RR was built in 1970 and rides better...with some good geometry and spring/shocks the Defender can ride very well....and dont rule out a load leveler its not a bad idea either.

    what lets rovers down is their predictable unpredictability...plus the usual stupid things like elecs, electrolisis, leaking, under powered (realisticly as a full time work rig) weakest driveline amongst rivals etc etc....bad decisions have been made by LR hq for along time now that have seen the coil sprung land rover take 1 step forward and another back in other areas....

    I love them but damn they **** me......

  3. #13
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Safety Bay
    Posts
    8,041
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by subasurf View Post
    I'm referring to bush vehicles, not every day use vehicles.
    Land Cruiser vs Defender. The Land Cruiser has earned it's reputation. The Defender has not...well, actually, it has....and it aint flattering.

    Don't get me wrong, I'm an avid Land Rover fan...I just don't think a good one has been made for over 20 years.
    Personal experience with both vehicles makes a mockery of that statement. Pat

  4. #14
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Safety Bay
    Posts
    8,041
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by sumo View Post
    Pat, its been a pain with top end rattle, they have that bucket & shim set up, Nobody seems to be able to get it right!. Its the 4.7l V8 petrol.


    Sumo
    Sumo,they are like holden red motors,some are quiet all thier lives,others rattle like a marble in a tin.It is a very time comsuming,hair pulling frustration of a job.And it needs to be done every 100,000k's or you could burn a exhaust valve. Pat

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    5,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Toyota has definitly had a better product in SOME aspects, but one thing is they have a better business plan and exicuition at EVERY level compared to LR hq and LR Au.

    not disregarding Pat's experience and other rover owners....Toyota's while not being the 'goldern chariot" some would believe, they aren't a **** heap either

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Bibra Lake, WA
    Posts
    599
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by PAT303 View Post
    Personal experience with both vehicles makes a mockery of that statement. Pat
    ...and the personal experience of many others, doesn't.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    VIC
    Posts
    3,536
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Toyota is a pretty amazing company if I can be honest. It's featured a fair part in my studies wrt to engineering because it's one of few manufacturers that has a well documented and widely adopted quality philosophy. Auto manufacturing represents a small part of what is a pretty diverse company that is able to succeed at just about anything it takes on because of such a well developed quality system. You only need to do a bit of reading on The Toyota Way and Toyota Production System to get an idea.

    Quote Originally Posted by PAT303 View Post
    Personal experience with both vehicles makes a mockery of that statement. Pat
    And my experience the opposite. Swings and roundabouts at the end of the day.

    If I was given a stack of money for a new 4x4 I'd have a particularly hard time deciding what to buy. I like Toyotas as much as I do Land Rovers.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    VIC
    Posts
    3,536
    Total Downloaded
    0
    To provide a bit of balance I'll add that the biggest laugh on forums is people who think a 2nd hand Toyota is going to be faultless compared with a bad experience to their 2nd hand Land Rover. A Toyota still needs to be maintained etc, it's not inherently reliable above and beyond what is reasonably expected. It's also important to bear in mind that 2nd hand vehicles over ten years old are often sold for that reason, they're getting on in age and mileage. I sold my first D1 because I saw big bills coming, I didn't like the 200Tdi + LT77 combo or the appearance of the interior.

    I've had zero problems with my D1 for well over 50,000km now, once I started using a proper LR specialist and learnt to ignore many "problems". I suspect my head gasket needs replacing, but I'm not doing a preventative, when there's irrefutable evidence it needs doing, I will, that could be tomorrow or the next owner's problem. I was concerned about half a circlip that drained out of my old LT77, but it never caused a problem during my tenure and a panic rebuild would have been money wasted.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South East Tasmania
    Posts
    10,705
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I have no problems with my 1998 Tdi 300 Disco after 100000 km and I am happy with my Defe after correcting some problems because the maintenance and services was not do properly before I got it.
    I believe that the LR vehicles are as good ad reliable as any other brand as long as the services and maintenance it is done correctly.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Yeppoon, QLD
    Posts
    293
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I had an 80 series diesel landcruiser. I would have taken it on any trip. I took it throught the Kimberleys and across the Simpson. Never gave the slightest trouble. However, it had a faultless service history and had done just above 100,000km.
    My 95 D1 on the other hand inspired no confidence. I did all the standard prep work before a big 8,000km trip. And yes, my concerns were well founded. The brakes failed at one point and the gearbox at another. The difference? Well it had done 380,000km!
    So now I have had plenty of time to consider things. The brake failure was caused by a split rubber brake hose, and given its age would have happened on any vehicle. The gearbox failure was caused by me overtightening the oil pump screws and distorting the backing plate - causing the oil to leak and the box to run dry.
    So, with plenty of thought I have come to this conclusion: the Landcruiser is much simpler with less to go wrong. Also the quality control is excellent. The Land Rover is more comfortable, has more features, more technology, is more powerful, more efficient and has more to go wrong. The quality control is not quite as good. I miss the 80 series, but the Land Rover is in my blood! As I overhaul things and learn its many foibles, I will regain confidence in having it as a reliable touring machine. This forum has helped me do that, and I can proudly say I have also been able to help others with my experiences.
    It seems we will always struggle with this Land Rover vs Toyota thing. If you don't like getting your hands dirty, then maybe a Landcruiser is for you. But the Land Rover has so much potential for being a better vehicle. It just takes some knowledge and good maintenance to get it there.

Page 2 of 11 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!