Thread: Corona Virus

Originally Posted by Eevo

are they?
20 cases and the testing system falls apart.

So, the white anting begins.

Consumer confidence rises for the 11th week.

Confidence rises for 11th straight week amid signs of jobs market recovery

It seems rarely a day goes by where we don't learn something new about COVID. Here is some good news about Virus immunity.

‘Really good news’ on virus immunity

While the world was wrapped up in the promising news of Moderna’s vaccine, my colleague Apoorva Mandavilli, who covers science for The Times, sent out a cryptic tweet that immediately piqued my interest.

This afternoon, Apoorva delivered: According to new research, immunity to the coronavirus may last years, perhaps even decades.

That’s good news because some experts worried that resistance to the virus could be fleeting, and it’s potentially great news for our ability to keep the virus under control with vaccines.

For months, reports of waning antibody levels led scientists to fear that resistance to the virus may be short lived. But researchers from the La Jolla Institute for Immunology who led the study looked at the body’s immune response in 185 patients, ages 19 to 81, who had recovered from the virus.

They tracked antibodies, but also B cells that can make more antibodies, and two types of T cells that kill other infected cells. The researchers also took blood samples from 38 people over many months.

The team found that antibodies stuck around, declining modestly six to eight months after infection, although the amount varied widely among the participants. T cells showed only a slight, slow decay in the body, while B cells actually grew in number. Researchers extrapolated from the slow level of decline over eight months, and concluded that people would most likely be protected for a few years. (How long, exactly, is still hard to predict.)

“This is really good news,” Apoorva told me. “Because if natural infection is producing such a strong immune response, a vaccine certainly will, because vaccines generally tend to produce stronger, more durable immune responses than natural infections.”

Experts also initially worried that resistance to the coronavirus might be similar to the flu, which would require people to be vaccinated every year. That would have created a logistical nightmare: The entire world would have to be vaccinated regularly just to keep the pandemic under control. But this research implies that may not be the case.

“It suggests we may have some breathing room, and that may help every country get back on its feet, in terms of the economy and keeping its population safe,” Apoorva said. “It also means that we may actually be able to contain this pandemic a little sooner than we had worried.”

Originally Posted by bob10

It seems rarely a day goes by where we don't learn something new about COVID. Here is some good news about Virus immunity.

This:


Immunity to the Coronavirus May Last Years, New Data Hint - The New York Times


Why You Shouldn’t Worry About Studies Showing Waning Coronavirus Antibodies - The New York Times

Originally Posted by DiscoDB

I wonder how many of those people in the queues actually even have any symptoms to justify waiting many hours to be tested.

Many aren’t concerned enough to wear a mask either and seem happy to join a queue with other strangers who may have COVID.

They really should be wearing masks.

Originally Posted by bob10

The SA government is doing the best they can in a difficult situation. The residents have been asked to present to be tested, and the numbers were more than could be processed quickly, so those who are well with no symptoms have been asked to stay home for now. There is no panic at this stage, merely citizens trying to do the right thing. We shouldn't turn this into something it is not. So far, , here at least, the vitriol and spite that was directed at Victoria, and it's government , Melbourne especially , has not emerged. Here's hoping it does not.

Couple of comments: when the outbreak occurred in Melbourne the response nationally was that we were guilty of a moral failure. The specialists who said that there was a large element of bad luck and that it was possible for this to occur in other States seem to have been ignored. What's surprising here is how the SA authorities appear to have learnt nothing from what happened in Victoria. Even a day ago the "experts" in SA were saying SA was in a much better position than Vic was - the obvious riposte is that they're obviously not because they've allowed this to happen at all.

When the outbreak occurred in Melbourne the head of the AMA in SA went into print lambasting Victoria, saying "Vics put us all at risk". Very helpful and sympathetic. So, his comments in this article now have more than a little poignancy:

AMA backs push to keep SA border closed after Victoria '''dropped the ball''' on coronavirus - ABC News

I guess all those South Australians living in Vic who fled to SA will now be coming back?

[QUOTE=bob10;3043930]

Originally Posted by 4bee

You are not the only one either bob. I remain extremely puzzled why this is being allowed to happen ie. Morale, $$$$$$$$, Image. ego?

Whatever the reason that some will justify, it will have a bad bad result, but I hope not, but Blind Freddy can see bad ****.

BTW, an interesting historical look at the beginnings of Lang Park.

What'''s left of the old Lang Park graveyard[/QUOTE


OOPs. Those old black fellas must be playing up again. Anyway, If anyone watched the last game of rugby at Lang Park, where the wallabies beat the All Blacks, you may have noticed old Uncle Joe gave the welcome to country, and at the end he said something along the lines of ' the great game of rugby league'. The All Blacks finished with 13 players on the field, Spooky. [ Rugby league has 13 in an on field team, Union has 15. Talk about point the bone. I think the ARU have signed Joe up ]

Uncle Joe knew a thing or two, "don't you worry about that"


NB. I presume we are not talking about Joe Stalin, also referred to as "Uncle Joe"? Sash would/may have known him.

Originally Posted by Arapiles

Couple of comments: when the outbreak occurred in Melbourne the response nationally was that we were guilty of a moral failure. The specialists who said that there was a large element of bad luck and that it was possible for this to occur in other States seem to have been ignored. What's surprising here is how the SA authorities appear to have learnt nothing from what happened in Victoria. Even a day ago the "experts" in SA were saying SA was in a much better position than Vic was - the obvious riposte is that they're obviously not because they've allowed this to happen at all.

When the outbreak occurred in Melbourne the head of the AMA in SA went into print lambasting Victoria, saying "Vics put us all at risk". Very helpful and sympathetic. So, his comments in this article now have more than a little poignancy:

AMA backs push to keep SA border closed after Victoria '''dropped the ball''' on coronavirus - ABC News

I guess all those South Australians living in Vic who fled to SA will now be coming back?

I bet their houses have been looted or set on fire & they will have bugger all to go back to.

If they had sold up, to buy it back would cost them double nay triple the price they flogged it for going by the greed that appears to be going on lately with everything. Estate Agents are probably on the biggest "On the make" list.

Lots of old **** was spouted by just about everyone then, but **** happens. Human nature??

We still have a very long road to travel with this thing & anyone who thinks otherwise needs their head examined once they extract it from the sand from whence it was buried.


Already Toilet Paper has disappeared from WW shelves, not sure about other stuff or other venues yet despite claims it was going to be rationed again. People do have a very short memory.