
 Originally Posted by 
Arapiles
					 
				 
				That article would barely pass at Law School.   The fact that this wasn't imprisonment is shown by the fact that people were in fact able to leave their houses and therefore be fined, noting that you can't freely leave a prison but instead have to break out.  And, generally speaking, prisoners don't get to go out for jogs or ride their bikes so long as they stay within X kilometres of their prison.  
Relevantly, from the time of the Magna Carta onwards, quarantine powers existed in England and that included locking down and isolating whole villages.  The "arbitrary" issue is dealt with by the fact that directives were made under a specific law.
			
		 
	 
 But how does that stand under NZ law, and their Bill of Rights. Considering a  Professor of Law wrote it, you would have to think it would stand very well at Law School. What does he know that you don't?
				
			 
			
		 
			
				
			
			
				I’m pretty sure the dinosaurs died out when they stopped gathering food and started having meetings to discuss gathering food
A bookshop is one of the only pieces of evidence we have that people are still thinking
			
			
		 
	
Bookmarks